Search for: "People v. Superior Court"
Results 1 - 20
of 3,416
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2022, 3:00 am
However, as we see in a recent decision from the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in Parekh et al v. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 3:00 am
However, as we see in a recent decision from the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in Parekh et al v. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 1:29 pm
But the Superior Court disagreed. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
” Supreme Court Justice Robert Grier in United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 7:37 am
The public power utility and police racially profiled Asian communities in the illegal data-sharing scheme.SACRAMENTO—The Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD) searches entire zip codes’ worth of people’s private data and discloses it to police without a warrant or any suspicion of wrongdoing, according to a privacy lawsuit filed Wednesday in Sacramento County Superior Court. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 1:24 pm
Cheng claims that his proposed Consensus Rule is epistemically superior to Rule 702 gatekeeping. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
” Now leading precedent in Canadian Aboriginal law, the decision produced in Delgamuukw v British Columbia has been cited countless times in both the courts and the legal academy. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 2:22 pm
(Tribal Court Jurisdiction Over Nonmembers; Insurance Coverage) Solenex, LLC v. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 3:30 pm
From yesterday's Ohio Supreme Court decision in State v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
Sometimes the heavens fall when people blindly follow rules that no longer serve their original purposes; sometimes the heavens fall when people insouciantly break rules that seem inconvenient at the moment. [read post]
1 Sep 2022, 3:58 am
Superior Court. 2. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
White Coats in the State Capital: OB-GYNs become political force in abortion wars Yahoo News – Alice Miranda Ollstein and Megan Messerly (Politico) | Published: 8/22/2022 Physicians, many of whom have never mobilized politically, are banding together in the wake of the Supreme Court overturning Roe v. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
When there is evidence of real risk of such violence—for instance, possible physical retaliation against people who cooperated with the government[21] or risk of violence against an asylum seeker in his home country[22]—courts do indeed generally allow pseudonymity, entirely apart from whether the violence stems from religious views.[23] The same would apply to people who fear religion-related violence, as in Doe v. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 11:09 am
In a court filing prior to the hearing, Ellis’s legal team had pointed to Georgia Court of Appeals precedent in Kenerly v. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 6:13 am
The state has no compelling interest in censoring speech it finds “repugnant,” the court wrote, and the First Amendment does not allow remedying unwanted speech with enforced silence (Honeyfund.com, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 9:10 am
Here's Ramsey: I was initially skeptical of the major questions doctrine (MQD), as deployed by the Supreme Court in West Virginia v. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 7:40 am
" Harris v. [read post]
20 Aug 2022, 8:47 pm
People v. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 6:34 am
While not directly comparable, this is similar to the position affirmed by the Court in Gillette v. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 11:04 am
Montera v. [read post]
