Search for: "People v. Superior Court"
Results 221 - 240
of 3,222
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2023, 6:07 am
From Cody v. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 8:51 am
Kelly v. [read post]
22 Oct 2023, 11:03 pm
While the vast majority of these relationships proceed without serious problems, there have been many publicized and non-publicized instances in which galleries have used their on-average superior bargaining position to the detriment of certain artists. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
On the criminal side, 27% of Superior Court cases nationwide had been open for more than 18 months in 2017-2018. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 5:01 am
The key case on this is NAACP v. [read post]
14 Oct 2023, 5:26 pm
When I first read the precedential ruling of the Pennsylvania Superior Court in Shell v. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 9:29 am
Superior Court): [Plaintiff] alleges [that] … DPH caused the suspension of Alliance's Twitter account. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 6:07 am
Alleged Hedingham Shooter’s Case Headed to Superior Court. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 9:02 pm
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit’s decision in Jarkesy v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 6:36 am
He remained in the position until being elected a Pima County Superior Court Judge. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 10:30 pm
The Court chooses a superior principle to resolve the cases, and establishes brick-by-brick (or in President Lenaert’s words “stone by stone”) an internal hierarchy between various Treaty norms and values. [read post]
16 Sep 2023, 6:44 am
Hamaday v. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 10:26 am
Here’s the Wall Street Journal under the demure title, “U.S. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 5:31 pm
See Navrides v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 12:13 pm
From today's decision by Judge Paul Oetken in Atas v. [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 11:44 am
Today The Hill published my article on Texas v. [read post]
Police stop for being parked in a “high crime area” is a prima facie violation of Racial Justice Act
31 Aug 2023, 7:11 pm
THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Respondent; THE PEOPLE, Real Party in Interest. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 5:01 am
Wash.) in Diemert v. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 3:00 am
Supreme Court, 51 Cal.3d 674, 687 (Cal. 1990). 10Forman v. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
The statute covers a very wide variety of federal officers and people acting under the direction of federal officers–including elected officials, federal civil employees, federal law enforcement officers, judges, postal workers, military officers, and more. [read post]
