Search for: "People v. Superior Court"
Results 261 - 280
of 3,217
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2010, 7:22 am
Referring to State v. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 8:47 am
In a decision issued in September 2008, a Connecticut Superior Court judge ruled in the case of Dornfried v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 6:49 pm
Meanwhile, as the Superior Court notes, Campbell lacked the capacity to marry. [read post]
30 Mar 2007, 4:13 am
People v. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 11:24 am
The first is the decision about two decades ago by the Superior Court and Commonwealth Court to issue non-precedential opinions. [read post]
25 May 2012, 8:30 am
The trial court (Los Angeles Superior, Judge Daniel J. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 10:00 am
The California Court of Appeal ruled yesterday in People v. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
In so holding, the Court examined and endorsed the Ninth Circuit's opinion in Hinojos v. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 4:44 am
In this post, Luke Arnold, Associate in the Real Estate team at CMS, previews the case of Rakusen v Jepson and Ors, which is due to be heard by the UK Supreme Court on 26 January 2023. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 1:13 pm
People v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 8:33 am
Last week, the California Supreme Court issued a long-awaited decision in Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 2:00 am
The Superior Court of Los Angeles County. [read post]
3 May 2018, 2:00 am
The Superior Court of Los Angeles County. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 11:41 am
Last week, the Utah Court of Appeals issued a decision in the case of Utah Alunite Corp. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2022, 2:48 pm
People v. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 12:20 pm
People v. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 7:42 am
In State v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 10:16 am
See this post on a state superior court decision that they cannot. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 9:51 am
A California Superior Court confirmed that Harris was right in 2013, and indeed Section 230 clearly prevents the prosecution. [read post]
22 Jan 2025, 5:26 pm
I'm always excited about published opinions from the Appellate Division of the Superior Court because they often involve oft-recurring conduct, which is often why the Appellate Division elected to publish the opinion in the first place. [read post]
