Search for: "People v. Superior Court"
Results 301 - 320
of 3,469
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2021, 4:03 am
In a recent case, Freyer v. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 2:17 pm
” As explained by the California Supreme Court in Patterson v. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 6:30 am
Even if or when this Court overturns Roe v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 7:25 am
Thus, it affirmed the Superior Court. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 6:55 pm
People v. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 3:51 pm
I generally like the published opinions of the Appellate Division of the Superior Court. [read post]
Case Law, Canada: Baglow v Smith, defence of “fair comment” succeeds in landmark blogging libel case
4 Mar 2015, 4:50 pm
In a judgment handed down on 23 February 2015 ( [2015] ONSC 1175), the Ontario Superior Court of Justice held that the operators of a right wing message board were publishers of defamatory material concerning a left wing blogger. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 9:06 am
But in a ruling this week, the Ontario Court of Appeal said a judge may, but is not required to, make observations from video evidence.In R. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 5:00 am
Superior Court, 27 Cal.App.4th 832 (1994), Allergan, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:45 am
A recent Superior Court decision, Childress v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:45 am
A recent Superior Court decision, Childress v. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 8:17 am
On Dec. 1, 2020, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Nestlé USA, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2006, 8:43 pm
The court cited to the case of McKevitt v. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 1:15 am
Ohaeri (2015) 240 Cal.App.4th 500 (failure to pay fee to reclassify case from limited to unlimited did not cap damages amount to maximum awardable in an unlimited case); Marriage of Oliverez (2015) 238 Cal.App.4th 1242 (limits on superior court judge’s power to reconsider rulings of another superior court judge); People v. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 1:15 am
Ohaeri (2015) 240 Cal.App.4th 500 (failure to pay fee to reclassify case from limited to unlimited did not cap damages amount to maximum awardable in an unlimited case); Marriage of Oliverez (2015) 238 Cal.App.4th 1242 (limits on superior court judge’s power to reconsider rulings of another superior court judge); People v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 11:09 am
A more surgical response is to remedy the deficiency by reading in the under-inclusive indigency provision in the Rules to include people who are “in need”: see Schachter v. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 11:32 pm
Dismissal of Misdemeanors Because No Courtroom Was Available is UpheldPeople v. [read post]
21 Jul 2007, 5:26 am
"You care about people as much as anyone I know," said V. [read post]
28 Mar 2020, 6:50 am
HSBC Bank v. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 1:57 pm
Footnote 2 of the opinion says: "Although the rationale is unclear to this court, Proposition 64 differentiates cannabis, which must be in an unopened, sealed, container, from 'loose cannabis flower,' which only needs to be in a closed container. [read post]
