Search for: "People v. Superior Court" Results 21 - 40 of 3,417
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2010, 11:03 pm
So sayeth the California Court of Appeal, which reverses the dismissal of an indictment. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 9:44 am
Respondent court found the campaign to prevent Judge Goethals from hearing long cause murder trials substantially interfered with the court’s ability to administer criminal justice in Orange County, and thereby violated the separation of powers doctrine. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 3:05 pm
  Our solution to the COVID-19 crisis is to simply leave insane people in local jails?! [read post]
7 Jun 2009, 1:53 am
We thus "may presume that the matter was properly before that court" (People v Chad S., 237 AD2d 986, lv denied 90 NY2d 856; see People v Hurd, 12 AD3d 1198, 1199, lv denied 4 NY3d 764).But in both People v Chad S. (237 AD2d 986) and People v Hurd (12 A.D.3d 1198) the Court had found that "the record fails to establish that defendant did not waive a preliminary hearing, that a hearing was not… [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 1:43 pm
 The People of the State of California agree, and support the trial court's view of the statute on appeal.But the Court of Appeal disagrees. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 12:52 pm
The Court of Appeal today grants a victory to people who want to post confidential (negative) reviews of their employer. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 8:29 pm by Shahram Miri
Craig, Los Angeles County Superior Court Case # GA086289 Sherry Behrle was a dependent adult living in Tujunga, CA. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 7:05 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, J.D., Ph.D.
I was contacted by a few people who were interested in attending the appellate hearing in Betancourt v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 4:12 pm
  So the trial court lets him go.The Court of Appeal reverses.Nope. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 10:21 am
  And I don't at all expect perfection from opinions by the Appellate Division of the Superior Court -- in this case, from Yolo County.But, as a general matter, there's no reason to include stuff in a published opinion that's unnecessary as well as routine. [read post]