Search for: "People v. Superior Court" Results 381 - 400 of 3,598
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2017, 12:53 pm
Superior Court (1996) 14 Cal.4th 294, 302.) [read post]
23 May 2011, 4:47 pm by Steven G. Pearl
The Court (Los Angeles Superior, Judge White) granted the motion: First, the court concluded that the holding of Fitz-Gerald v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 12:37 pm
Up to 900 people are poised to sue Cassels Brock & Brockwell LLP following an appeal court ruling certifying a class action against the firm.By overturning a previous order in Lipson v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 12:00 pm by Brad Pauley
Frazer (1999) 21 Cal.4th 737, 775, fn. 32 [Court requested supplemental post-argument briefing regarding a statute’s constitutionality]; People v. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 2:42 pm by Russell Knight
Many people who interact with the Illinois family system hold it in very low regard. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
When there is evidence of real risk of such violence—for instance, possible physical retaliation against people who cooperated with the government[21] or risk of violence against an asylum seeker in his home country[22]—courts do indeed generally allow pseudonymity, entirely apart from whether the violence stems from religious views.[23] The same would apply to people who fear religion-related violence, as in Doe v. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 1:42 pm
Here's a report of a lawsuit filed on March 2 in Superior Court in Oakland, California: Rev. [read post]
7 May 2010, 3:25 am
Gardner v Broderick, 392 US 273 and People v Corrigan, 80 NY2d 326 discuss the parameters of immunity in connection with compelling a public officer or employee to answer questions concerning his or her performance of official duties.If, however, an individual fails to answer questions truthfully where he or she has use or transactional immunity, such immunity does not prevent the fact that he or she answered falsely from being used against the individual if he or she is… [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 6:05 am by John J. Cord
The New Jersey Superior Court Case (Middlesex County) of Baker v. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 11:55 am
Here's the answer.The Appellate Division of the Superior Court of Fresno decides, in a published opinion, that the answer is yes. [read post]
4 May 2011, 11:13 am by The Complex Litigator
Superior Court, 36 Cal. 4th 148, 113 P. 3d 1100 (2005), the court found that the arbitration provision was unconscionable because AT&T had not shown that bilateral arbitration adequately substituted for the deterrent effects of class actions. [read post]