Search for: "People v. Superior Court"
Results 401 - 420
of 3,627
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2011, 11:13 am
Superior Court, 36 Cal. 4th 148, 113 P. 3d 1100 (2005), the court found that the arbitration provision was unconscionable because AT&T had not shown that bilateral arbitration adequately substituted for the deterrent effects of class actions. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 11:55 am
Here's the answer.The Appellate Division of the Superior Court of Fresno decides, in a published opinion, that the answer is yes. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 8:50 am
Truman v. [read post]
24 Jan 2009, 1:37 pm
The case is Crawford v. [read post]
4 Jul 2008, 8:09 am
Once again, I am indebted to Magistrate Marcia Linsky of the Allen County (Indiana) Superior Court for an interesting new decision. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 6:14 am
In Kubert v. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 8:59 pm
History was made on June 26, 2020, in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice decision in R. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 4:00 am
Many people will be able to access hearings from the comfort of their homes. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 5:49 am
See Washington v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 2:57 pm
Interestingly, the Court was much more sensitive to considerations of context in its recent decision in NRA v. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 9:06 am
Not an easy decision by the Superior Court; but the right one. [read post]
26 Mar 2011, 12:33 pm
”PEOPLE V. [read post]
22 May 2008, 12:59 pm
Superior Court (Benitez), S142892. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 5:00 am
Superior Court, supra, 114 Cal.App.4th 309, 330.) [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 9:13 am
People v. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 5:37 pm
Following the California Supreme Court’s decision in People v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 4:56 pm
(People ex rel. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 6:45 am
In MTCC 985 v. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 4:08 pm
Not one, not two, but three judges in San Francisco Superior Court either recused themselves or were asked to step aside by counsel on Wednesday during a hearing in a case over bar exam data. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 12:49 pm
The case will be prosecuted in the Worcester Superior Court. [read post]
