Search for: "People v. Superior Court"
Results 401 - 420
of 3,245
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jan 2023, 2:34 pm
From Arizona Republican Party v. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 1:20 am
The case is Tenczar v. [read post]
14 Jan 2023, 5:13 pm
People v. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 10:00 am
Because of the court’s recent decision in State v. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 10:00 am
Because of the court’s recent decision in State v. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 5:12 pm
If you're in jail, and I'm your attorney, please do not send things to me in envelope marked "Legal Mail" if they have previously been up your butt. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 9:06 am
Not an easy decision by the Superior Court; but the right one. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 4:54 am
In People v. [read post]
7 Jan 2023, 7:15 pm
Superior Court of San Diego County (Cal. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 12:45 pm
People v. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 5:20 am
Superior Ct. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
The “governed”—the American people (“We the people”)—accept the system and process. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 3:30 am
In most legal orgs, this percentage is near negligible, especially if the org is being honest with itself about (i) how many personnel in putative innovation roles (legal operations, knowledge management, project management) are consumed by active matters, existing programs, and administration, (ii) how much technology spend is maintenance, and (iii) how many projects are purely aspirational with no real resources save the illusory spare hours of already busy people. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 4:35 pm
Trump v. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 9:45 am
From Dodge v. [read post]
18 Dec 2022, 1:36 pm
"In this symposium, scholars reflect on the European Court of Human Rights’ recent Basu v. [read post]
17 Dec 2022, 7:00 pm
(Basu v. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 9:22 pm
People v. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 3:30 am
Osamudia James, Superior Status: Relational Obstacles in the Law to Racial Justice and LGBTQ Equality, 63 B.C. [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
Perhaps provinces should not be allowed to exclude people from superior courts unless the tribunals they establish as alternatives offer a reasonable modicum of access to justice. [read post]