Search for: "People v. Superior Court" Results 561 - 580 of 3,640
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Sep 2021, 5:36 am by JURIST Staff
While alternate dispute mechanisms provide a possible solution to the problem, until such time as the superior courts are made to function as courts of appeal on every single issue arising in a case, there cannot be delivery of speedy justice to the common man in India. [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 5:21 am by Vercammen Law
On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Middlesex County, Docket P- 250777-16. [read post]
27 Aug 2021, 10:22 am by Eugene Volokh
Yesterday's Washington Supreme Court decision in Stout v. [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 3:35 pm by Resnick Law Group, P.C.
A pair of lawsuits filed in a New Jersey Superior Court earlier this summer allege same-sex sexual harassment. [read post]
20 Aug 2021, 9:58 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Superior Court, federal district courts around the country have wrestled with whether they may exercise personal jurisdiction over employers as to FLSA claims brought by people who worked and were paid outside of the forum state. [read post]
20 Aug 2021, 3:42 am by Earl Drott
In Texas, employers will only be deemed responsible for harm caused by their employees in limited circumstances, though, as discussed in an opinion recently issued by a Texas court in Rios Pina v. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 5:49 am by Alexander Smith
Recent Ontario Decisions Lean in Favour of the Parent Who Supports Following Public Health Vaccination Guidance In two recent Ontario Superior Court decisions, the court has had to address the issue of which parent should be entitled to decision-making authority when they disagree on whether to vaccinate their children against vaccine-preventable diseases and COVID-19. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 2:06 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Basically, reasonable royalties are superior to statutory damages and disgorgement for public policy reasons. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 4:02 pm by Jonathan Pyzer
With respect to the Criminal Code, an individual is considered to be in possession of narcotics or substances in any of the following circumstances: Individuals knowingly have the substance/narcotic on their person;The defendant knowingly has the substance/narcotic in possession, custody of another person, or in any place (whether or not that place belongs to or is occupied by the defendant and/or whether or not the drug is in that place for the defendant’s own benefit); orMore than… [read post]