Search for: "People v. Superior Court" Results 681 - 700 of 3,625
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2020, 8:30 am by Eugene Volokh
Indeed, the lower court's decision creates incentives for people to commit crimes; and it undermines the legal and constitutional rights of law-abiding businesses and their clients. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 9:03 pm by Marvin Schuldiner
So if tax filings were not done correctly, a Superior Court Judge is obligated (under the Sheridan v. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 10:43 am by Eugene Volokh
In Travis v Murray, the court, in the context of a divorce action, was called upon to decide with whom Joey, a miniature dachshund, should live. [read post]
Most people know overtly sexual comments are likely to violate their employer’s rules and could lead to sexual harassment claims. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 11:53 pm by Evan Schwartz
  For example, the California Supreme Court ruled in Liberty Surplus Insurance Corp. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 5:52 am by David J. Halberg, Esq.
The latter can be tough to prove, though the Florida Supreme Court did find in the 1991 case of Ellis v. [read post]
22 Nov 2020, 4:01 am by Administrator
The Superior Court judge erred in dismissing the amended and particularized motion for authorization and to obtain the status of representative, against the appellants. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 11:23 am by rainey Reitman
Dunkins (EFF) New Federal Court Rulings Find Geofence Warrants Unconstitutional (EFF) EFF Files Amicus Brief Arguing Geofence Warrants Violate the Fourth Amendment (Ongoing case of People v Dawes in SF Superior Court re geofence warrants)  People v. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 6:00 am by Jane Turner
He was the point man in a court case that reverberates to this day, and he outsmarted many people who tried desperately to silence him. [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 6:57 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The Ontario Superior Court of Justice dismissed a motion for an injunction on exactly this issue recently, in Black et al. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 4:32 am by Stephen Sachs
The oral argument transcript in California v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 2:18 pm by Kevin LaCroix
”[v] This means compliance must be shown not only for plaintiff Jones but also for every offer and every sale in the “offering. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 1:25 pm by rainey Reitman
Xavier Becerra and United States of America v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 2:13 pm by Mark Ashton
Mellon Bank, NA, the Superior Court said that in Pennsylvania, property subject to court orders is not subject to attachment by judicial liens. [read post]