Search for: "People v. Superior Court"
Results 721 - 740
of 3,289
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Nov 2020, 6:57 pm
The Ontario Superior Court of Justice dismissed a motion for an injunction on exactly this issue recently, in Black et al. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 1:25 pm
Xavier Becerra and United States of America v. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 8:14 pm
People V. [read post]
8 Nov 2020, 9:28 pm
People v. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 10:34 am
And that finally brings us to the current Court of Federal Claims decision, Superior Optical Labs, Inc., v. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 7:04 am
And sometime this evening, or maybe a couple of days from now, we will have a lot of new people in office, maybe some of the same. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 5:01 pm
In Rowbotham v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 9:16 am
Under the Constitution, according to Gorsuch, judges cannot “improvise with their own election rules in place of those the people’s representatives have adopted. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 4:00 am
Jackson 2018 ONSC 2527 (CanLII), Justice Nakatsuru of the Ontario Superior Court noted that “[s]entencing is and has always been a very individual process. [read post]
24 Oct 2020, 6:10 pm
Alabama: In People First v. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 4:00 am
The recent decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in, R. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 8:43 am
In 1961, the Supreme Court made clear in Monroe v. [read post]
18 Oct 2020, 4:59 pm
On 13 October 2020 there was a statement in open court in the case of Warnes v Forge before Warby J. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 1:52 pm
The Court said that workers were employees so long as one of the following criteria were met (1) they were under the control of the employer; (2) the worker was performing work on the company’s business: (3) the workers were not independent trades people. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 10:49 am
Superior Court (Scofield), 249 Cal. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 7:13 pm
Section 27 of the proposed CLRA stays any provisions that are commenced under the Divorce Act, so we may see very different approaches towards parenting plans emerge at the Ontario Court of Justice and the Superior Court of Justice. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 9:29 am
Supreme Court on Monday, Carney v. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 9:06 am
While experts have noted that these provisions do not expressly address elections for federal office, an Arizona superior court judge ruled in the 2016 case Brakey v. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 7:36 pm
People v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 10:40 am
The truth is the media covers up horrific numbers of racist hate crimes against White people! [read post]
