Search for: "People v. Superior Court"
Results 101 - 120
of 3,585
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Sep 2023, 10:26 am
Here’s the Wall Street Journal under the demure title, “U.S. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 5:31 pm
See Navrides v. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 8:53 am
The offence of abandoning a child is found in Part V of the Criminal Code. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 12:13 pm
From today's decision by Judge Paul Oetken in Atas v. [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 11:44 am
Today The Hill published my article on Texas v. [read post]
Police stop for being parked in a “high crime area” is a prima facie violation of Racial Justice Act
31 Aug 2023, 7:11 pm
THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Respondent; THE PEOPLE, Real Party in Interest. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 5:01 am
Wash.) in Diemert v. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 3:00 am
Supreme Court, 51 Cal.3d 674, 687 (Cal. 1990). 10Forman v. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
The statute covers a very wide variety of federal officers and people acting under the direction of federal officers–including elected officials, federal civil employees, federal law enforcement officers, judges, postal workers, military officers, and more. [read post]
26 Aug 2023, 7:50 pm
The superior court permitted the People to withdraw a pending petition for revocation of parole that CDCR filed against Escobedo, who was on lifetime parole when he committed his offense. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 5:33 am
Most people have not had the experience of attending a court proceeding or testifying under oath. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
A recent case from the Ontario Superior Court of Justice explored how a “regular rate” of pay should be calculated in relation to overtime hours. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
A recent case from the Ontario Superior Court of Justice explored how a “regular rate” of pay should be calculated in relation to overtime hours. [read post]
20 Aug 2023, 5:20 pm
People v. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 5:03 am
It shows that reasonable people can work things out with each other. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 12:13 pm
Smith v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 7:35 am
People with felony convictions are not eligible to serve. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 6:48 am
Jacobson v. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 10:26 am
Indeed, in McDonald’s II, the court reached back before Caremark to the 1963 Delaware Supreme Court decision in Graham v. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 11:58 pm
Who do you think is right in this one; the trial court or the Court of Appeal? [read post]
