Search for: "People v. Superior Court" Results 121 - 140 of 3,522
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2022, 4:15 am by Howard Friedman
Religious people may be genuinely offended by claims that others’ religion is superior to theirs. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 2:30 pm
 More power to her.The trial court orders placement with Ms. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 3:22 pm
  I'm not always wrong.Or at least, when I say something, other -- wiser -- people occasionally come to agree with me.Of course, even a broken clock is right twice a day. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 2:55 pm
Above the superior court system are state appellate courts that, as the name suggests, hear appeals from people who believe they have been wrongly convicted of a crime. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 2:19 pm
  They usually don't happen in the parking lot of the Superior Court in Santa Monica.Yikes.I can't tell from the opinion what the defendant was doing in the parking lot. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 1:37 pm
  Counsel also learns that the experts will also disclose any active threats by the interviewee to kill people, on the ground that if they fail to do so, there's liability under Tarasoff.Counsel doesn't like that, and thinks that everything should be confidential. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 2:17 pm
They contend that a request for constructive filing of an appeal may be sought only by a petition for writ of habeas corpus filed first in the superior court. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:57 am by Steven G. Pearl
Superior Court (2010) 184 Cal.App.4th 825, 836 [“while Discover Bank is a case about unconscionability, the rule set forth in Gentry is concerned with the effect of a class action waiver on unwaivable rights regardless of unconscionability”]; People v. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 3:26 pm
Opinion Is Found, Potentially Inuring to Benefit of Petitioning Inmate about People v. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 5:00 pm by Gordon R. Smith
The Maine Superior Court has dismissed all claims against five intertidal landowners represented by Verrill in Masucci v. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 4:01 pm
He explained he was instructed “not to say what goes on in the house cause they don’t want to go to court. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 9:31 pm
Court" and then published this analysis: REST BREAK AND MEAL PERIOD CLAIMS AFTER MURPHY V. [read post]