Search for: "People v. Superior Court"
Results 141 - 160
of 3,222
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2024, 8:09 am
The opinion of the Superior Court goes into some detail but suffice to say that people living with Mr. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 2:41 pm
People v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 1:15 pm
(Quiet Title Act; Administrative Procedure Act) Grand Portage Band of Lake Superior Chippewa v. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 6:58 am
This problem is a piece of the March 26 ruling by the Superior Court in O’Patchen v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 11:59 am
Some people have found the assessment harsh and unjustified. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
Afflicted with a “culture of complacency[1],” the Ontario Superior Court has long struggled to timely advance cases to trial. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 5:02 am
Sahil Kapur and Frank Thorp V report for NBC News. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 9:36 pm
(Rafael Henrique | Dreamstime.com)On Monday, the Supreme Court held oral argument in Murthy v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 5:00 am
In a decision marked as "Non-Precedential" in the case of Kent v. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 4:05 pm
The Superior Court denied the request but ordered the trial court to review the matter. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 1:48 pm
There's a California Supreme Court case called People v. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 5:50 am
He thought he had superior hard power, but underestimated Western unity and sanctions and relied too heavily on conscripts. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 4:07 pm
Those people will receive sentences from the district court that commits them to the custody of the commissioner of corrections. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 4:07 pm
Those people will receive sentences from the district court that commits them to the custody of the commissioner of corrections. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
Dred Scott, The Civil Rights Cases, Lochner, Reynolds v. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 7:42 am
They go by various names—Freedom of Information, Right-to-Know, Open Records, or even Sunshine laws—but all share the general concept that because the government is of the people, its documents belong to the people. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 4:39 pm
Historically, courts have been cautious about encroaching on sacred terrain when interpreting family law; however, the Supreme Court of Canada in Marcovitz v Bruker, (2007 SCC 54), settled this contention. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 4:39 pm
Historically, courts have been cautious about encroaching on sacred terrain when interpreting family law; however, the Supreme Court of Canada in Marcovitz v Bruker, (2007 SCC 54), settled this contention. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 7:15 am
[The Supreme Court's ruling in Trump v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 6:05 pm
Superior Court of NJ, Appellate Division A-1543-22 (3/1/24) (nonprecedential) [read post]
