Search for: "People v. Superior Court (1970)" Results 1 - 20 of 121
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2020, 4:25 pm by Patricia Hughes
Furthermore, six other judges, one in the Ontario Supreme Court and five on the Ontario Court of Appeal, also held it was valid. [read post]
5 May 2020, 9:16 am by Bridget Crawford
Superior Ct of Amador Cnty, 470 P.2d 617 (Cal. 1970) (killing of fetus) Whitner v. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 4:00 am by Gary P. Rodrigues
Then in 1973 the Supreme Court of Canada case Calder v. [read post]
26 Dec 2019, 1:50 pm by Eugene Volokh
Superior Court (2018) 4 Cal.5th 607, 632 [discussing 2000 article on deterrence effects of reporting potentially violent patients], People v. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:43 am by Rebecca Tushnet
If courts take conceptual separability seriously, it becomes the German test in disguise—but even the German court has now abandoned a test of superior creativity, so there’s only one test of originality in German law, which doesn’t require superior creativity. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm by admin
Jeffries Homes Housing Project, 306 Mich 638, 647-48; 11 NW2d 272 (1943); Grand Rapids Bd of Ed v Baczewski, 340 Mich 265, 270-71; 65 NW2d 810 (1954); Dep’t of Conservation v Connor, 316 Mich 565, 576-78; 25 NW2d 619 (1947). 9  See Chicago, Detroit, etc v Jacobs, 225 Mich 677; 196 NW 621 (1924); Michigan Air Line Ry v Barnes, 44 Mich 222; 6 NW 651 (1880); Toledo, etc R Co v Dunlap, 47 Mich 456; 11 NW 271 (1882); Detroit, etc R Co v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm by admin
Jeffries Homes Housing Project, 306 Mich 638, 647-48; 11 NW2d 272 (1943); Grand Rapids Bd of Ed v Baczewski, 340 Mich 265, 270-71; 65 NW2d 810 (1954); Dep’t of Conservation v Connor, 316 Mich 565, 576-78; 25 NW2d 619 (1947). 9  See Chicago, Detroit, etc v Jacobs, 225 Mich 677; 196 NW 621 (1924); Michigan Air Line Ry v Barnes, 44 Mich 222; 6 NW 651 (1880); Toledo, etc R Co v Dunlap, 47 Mich 456; 11 NW 271 (1882); Detroit, etc R Co v. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 4:43 am by Curtis Bradley, Jack Goldsmith
To be sure, the issue is not entirely settled because the Supreme Court, in Goldwater v. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 8:17 am by Andrew Hamm
Question: Your title (like mine) comes from the Supreme Court’s 1968 opinion in Tinker v. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 1:56 pm
Superior Court (2012) 53 Cal.4th 1004, 1026; Reynolds v. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 11:02 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
The court explored a tricky concept here – there was nothing that was completely on point – relying on Niederlehner v. [read post]