Search for: "People v. Superior Court (1970)" Results 21 - 40 of 161
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2021, 12:35 pm by Vercammen Law
 . . suggest[ed] a superior level of receptive language functions” and that her “measures of nonverbal domains including memory, spatial processing and nonverbal abstract reasoning” were above average. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
That rule makes clear that a parent-child tie can be created by consent without any biological tie.Moreover, to the extent the marital presumption is a benefit of marriage, rather than a tight proxy for a genetic tie, it must be available to same-sex as well as different-sex couples in order to comply with the Supreme Court’s ruling in Obergefell v. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 11:23 am by rainey Reitman
Dunkins (EFF) New Federal Court Rulings Find Geofence Warrants Unconstitutional (EFF) EFF Files Amicus Brief Arguing Geofence Warrants Violate the Fourth Amendment (Ongoing case of People v Dawes in SF Superior Court re geofence warrants)  People v. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 6:00 am by Jane Turner
He was the point man in a court case that reverberates to this day, and he outsmarted many people who tried desperately to silence him. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 4:25 pm by Patricia Hughes
Furthermore, six other judges, one in the Ontario Supreme Court and five on the Ontario Court of Appeal, also held it was valid. [read post]
5 May 2020, 9:16 am by Bridget Crawford
Superior Ct of Amador Cnty, 470 P.2d 617 (Cal. 1970) (killing of fetus) Whitner v. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 4:00 am by Gary P. Rodrigues
Then in 1973 the Supreme Court of Canada case Calder v. [read post]
26 Dec 2019, 1:50 pm by Eugene Volokh
Superior Court (2018) 4 Cal.5th 607, 632 [discussing 2000 article on deterrence effects of reporting potentially violent patients], People v. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:43 am by Rebecca Tushnet
If courts take conceptual separability seriously, it becomes the German test in disguise—but even the German court has now abandoned a test of superior creativity, so there’s only one test of originality in German law, which doesn’t require superior creativity. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm by admin
Jeffries Homes Housing Project, 306 Mich 638, 647-48; 11 NW2d 272 (1943); Grand Rapids Bd of Ed v Baczewski, 340 Mich 265, 270-71; 65 NW2d 810 (1954); Dep’t of Conservation v Connor, 316 Mich 565, 576-78; 25 NW2d 619 (1947). 9  See Chicago, Detroit, etc v Jacobs, 225 Mich 677; 196 NW 621 (1924); Michigan Air Line Ry v Barnes, 44 Mich 222; 6 NW 651 (1880); Toledo, etc R Co v Dunlap, 47 Mich 456; 11 NW 271 (1882); Detroit, etc R Co v. [read post]