Search for: "People v. Superior Court (1970)" Results 41 - 60 of 162
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm by admin
Jeffries Homes Housing Project, 306 Mich 638, 647-48; 11 NW2d 272 (1943); Grand Rapids Bd of Ed v Baczewski, 340 Mich 265, 270-71; 65 NW2d 810 (1954); Dep’t of Conservation v Connor, 316 Mich 565, 576-78; 25 NW2d 619 (1947). 9  See Chicago, Detroit, etc v Jacobs, 225 Mich 677; 196 NW 621 (1924); Michigan Air Line Ry v Barnes, 44 Mich 222; 6 NW 651 (1880); Toledo, etc R Co v Dunlap, 47 Mich 456; 11 NW 271 (1882); Detroit, etc R Co v. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 4:43 am by Curtis Bradley, Jack Goldsmith
To be sure, the issue is not entirely settled because the Supreme Court, in Goldwater v. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 8:17 am by Andrew Hamm
Question: Your title (like mine) comes from the Supreme Court’s 1968 opinion in Tinker v. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 1:56 pm
Superior Court (2012) 53 Cal.4th 1004, 1026; Reynolds v. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 11:02 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
The court explored a tricky concept here – there was nothing that was completely on point – relying on Niederlehner v. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 7:07 am by Nassiri Law
This particular conflict began with three lawsuits in the Superior Court of California County of San Diego separately filed last summer by female professors at the Salk Institute for Biological Studies in La Jolla, California. [read post]
10 Sep 2017, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
Superior Court, which the California Supreme Court decided in 1998. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 7:45 am
This post examines a recent opinion from the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas: State v. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 11:49 am by Jack Sharman
  As the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit said in United States v. [read post]
29 May 2017, 12:46 pm
For the proof of causation in asbestos, the Superior Court has adopted the frequency, regularity, proximity test. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 6:55 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Resolving Juror Confusion New York’s Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department rendered an opinion in People v. [read post]