Search for: "People v. Superior Court (1970)" Results 61 - 80 of 122
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Dec 2019, 1:50 pm by Eugene Volokh
Superior Court (2018) 4 Cal.5th 607, 632 [discussing 2000 article on deterrence effects of reporting potentially violent patients], People v. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 2:57 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, December 17, 2008 US v. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 3:56 pm
Similarly, some well-meaning people opposed interracial marriage without believing that one race is inherently superior to another (e.g. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 9:30 am by Devlin Hartline
I think some people dismissed my post completely just based on its title—the reasoning didn’t matter since the conclusions weren’t what those people wanted to hear. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 5:00 am
For most of our country's history, until the 1970's, the Supreme Court did not consider commercial speech part of the original conception of speech. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:43 am by Rebecca Tushnet
If courts take conceptual separability seriously, it becomes the German test in disguise—but even the German court has now abandoned a test of superior creativity, so there’s only one test of originality in German law, which doesn’t require superior creativity. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 4:43 am by Curtis Bradley, Jack Goldsmith
To be sure, the issue is not entirely settled because the Supreme Court, in Goldwater v. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 8:17 am by Andrew Hamm
Question: Your title (like mine) comes from the Supreme Court’s 1968 opinion in Tinker v. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Supreme Court ruled in a series of cases in the 1970s and 1980s that unwed fathers had constitutionally protected parental rights, which could not be categorically disregarded by state parentage and custody laws. [read post]