Search for: "People v. Superior Court (1970)" Results 101 - 120 of 162
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2024, 2:38 am by Mayela Celis
It also puts into context the superiority of the French approach regarding abortion, which is proven with the reversal of Roe. [read post]
4 Jul 2021, 6:41 am
It was to be a complaint laid before the court of British and world opinion.Its purpose was to persuade those in a position to judge that the actions of American revolutionaries were justified both asa matter of law, that is, as   a  matter of general principles of political and  moral theory. and as a matter of fact, that is, on the application of these principles to the specific acts of mistreatment suffered by the American colonies at the instigation of the government… [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 8:54 am by Kelly Buchanan
This included annual Waitangi Day protests that commenced in the early 1970s and have continued throughout the 2000s. 1975: The Land March, calling for an end to the alienation of Māori land, traveled from the far north of the country to Parliament at the bottom of the North Island, 1,000 kilometers (621 miles) away, with many people joining along the way. [read post]
10 Sep 2017, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
Superior Court, which the California Supreme Court decided in 1998. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm by Bexis
Superior Court, 920 P.2d 1347, 1354 (Cal. 1996); Brown v. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 12:22 pm
Superior Court), given that the earlier trial was in the federal court system (the D.C. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 2:31 pm by Ilya Somin
My own view is that courts can best empower ordinary people by helping to enable them to "vote with their feet," which is in many respects superior to both ballot-box voting and concentrating power in the hands of experts. [read post]
22 May 2014, 2:35 pm
The suit was filed in Superior Court, the New Jersey trial court of general jurisdiction. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 11:49 am by Jack Sharman
  As the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit said in United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm by admin
Jeffries Homes Housing Project, 306 Mich 638, 647-48; 11 NW2d 272 (1943); Grand Rapids Bd of Ed v Baczewski, 340 Mich 265, 270-71; 65 NW2d 810 (1954); Dep’t of Conservation v Connor, 316 Mich 565, 576-78; 25 NW2d 619 (1947). 9  See Chicago, Detroit, etc v Jacobs, 225 Mich 677; 196 NW 621 (1924); Michigan Air Line Ry v Barnes, 44 Mich 222; 6 NW 651 (1880); Toledo, etc R Co v Dunlap, 47 Mich 456; 11 NW 271 (1882); Detroit, etc R Co v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
 This freedom to speak against the government and government officials is essential in a free society committed to the preeminence of the people. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 4:25 pm by Patricia Hughes
Furthermore, six other judges, one in the Ontario Supreme Court and five on the Ontario Court of Appeal, also held it was valid. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 6:00 am by Jane Turner
He was the point man in a court case that reverberates to this day, and he outsmarted many people who tried desperately to silence him. [read post]