Search for: "People v. Superior Court (Commons) (1982)"
Results 1 - 20
of 55
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2023, 4:00 am
In Ontario, the Superior Court is the trial court, responsible for applying and interpreting the Constitution, legislation passed by both levels of government and the common law. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 8:33 am
Unlike the Federal Court, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice is a court of inherent jurisdiction whose jurisdiction to judicially review governmental action is a common law right as opposed to a statutory grant of power. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 6:49 am
See People v. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 11:03 am
Fashing, 457 U.S. 957 (1982). [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 4:00 am
” This column considers what our commitment to open courts should look like in a world where virtual hearings are, if not ubiquitous, quite suddenly much more common. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 5:43 pm
Georgia (1972) 408 U.S. 238, until rendered moot by the California Supreme Court decision in People v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 4:52 pm
(Superior Court of Santa Clara County, No. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 9:01 am
Superior Court, 457 U.S. 596, 606 (1982); Volokh is included in both those categories. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 5:35 am
(E.g., Guido Calabresi, A Common Law for the Age of Statutes (Union NJ: LawBook Exchange, 1999 (1982)). [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
The statute covers a very wide variety of federal officers and people acting under the direction of federal officers–including elected officials, federal civil employees, federal law enforcement officers, judges, postal workers, military officers, and more. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 6:30 am
But some calls for reform arise more from a felt need to respond to what are seen as abuses of the confirmation process in very recent years.[13] As is well-known, the Senate refused even to consider President Obama’s nomination of Merrick Garland in March 2016, shortly after the death of Justice Scalia in February, on the ground that it was within 8 months of a presidential election and the Senate should wait and “give the people a voice” in the selection of a new… [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 8:09 am
(Dickerson v. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 5:28 pm
Superior Court, Santa Clara, 74 Cal.App.4th 1008, 1012 (Cal. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Inst. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 12:32 pm
Quebec invoked it routinely under the Parti Québécois as a form of political protest, and then notably in 1988, following the Supreme Court of Canada decision Ford v. [read post]
3 Apr 2022, 8:50 pm
More recently though, the Court stated in 2014 in Tsilhqot’in Nation v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 8:10 am
Corp. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 10:38 am
Superior Court (Cal. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 3:04 pm
In addition to this common-law right of access, there is also a First Amendment right of access to court documents in civil proceedings. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
The first section unpacks the concept of law--common law, equity, statutes, regulation and law beyond law (social norms, and functional law. [read post]
