Search for: "People v. Superior Court (Commons) (1982)"
Results 1 - 20
of 55
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Inst. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2024, 9:24 pm
McLaughlin v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
People often think that “marriage” and “family” are synonymous, but these words are not interchangeable in law. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 5:01 am
The key case on this is NAACP v. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
The statute covers a very wide variety of federal officers and people acting under the direction of federal officers–including elected officials, federal civil employees, federal law enforcement officers, judges, postal workers, military officers, and more. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 4:00 am
In Ontario, the Superior Court is the trial court, responsible for applying and interpreting the Constitution, legislation passed by both levels of government and the common law. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:54 am
Forum for Academic & Institutional Rights,[1] and it is the foundation of the wide range of antidiscrimination laws, public accommodation laws, and common carrier laws throughout the nation. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
In doing so, he actually hurt many people. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 5:28 pm
Superior Court, Santa Clara, 74 Cal.App.4th 1008, 1012 (Cal. [read post]
20 May 2022, 1:56 pm
For example, my amicus brief in Espinoza v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 6:30 am
But some calls for reform arise more from a felt need to respond to what are seen as abuses of the confirmation process in very recent years.[13] As is well-known, the Senate refused even to consider President Obama’s nomination of Merrick Garland in March 2016, shortly after the death of Justice Scalia in February, on the ground that it was within 8 months of a presidential election and the Senate should wait and “give the people a voice” in the selection of a new… [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 9:01 am
Superior Court, 457 U.S. 596, 606 (1982); Volokh is included in both those categories. [read post]
3 Apr 2022, 8:50 pm
More recently though, the Court stated in 2014 in Tsilhqot’in Nation v. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 10:38 am
Superior Court (Cal. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 5:37 am
Generally Public naming of litigants is one aspect of the broader "presumption, long supported by courts, that the public has a common-law right of access to judicial records. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 9:17 am
” (R. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 4:00 am
” This column considers what our commitment to open courts should look like in a world where virtual hearings are, if not ubiquitous, quite suddenly much more common. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 4:00 am
Then in 1973 the Supreme Court of Canada case Calder v. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 5:01 am
" 458 U.S. 886, 907, 909, 910, 933 (1982). [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
Court of Appeal’s ruling in R. v. [read post]
