Search for: "People v. Superior Court (Marks) (1991)"
Results 1 - 20
of 43
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2012, 5:12 am
Mendoza, 722 F.2d 96, 97 n.1 (5th Cir. 1983).7 We agree with the majority of the Courts of Appeals that have addressed this issue and find that by failing to raise the issue of standing in the Superior Court, the People have waived the issue on appeal. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 7:56 am
Innovation Ventures, LLC v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 4:52 pm
(Superior Court of Santa Clara County, No. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 8:51 am
Mark Anderson, Respondents. [read post]
10 May 2023, 3:43 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 3:27 pm
S. 225, 231-233 (1991) (discussing appellate courts' "institutional advantages" in giving legal guidance). [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 9:56 pm
Super Ct. 2000), and it is an unreported superior court decision from Connecticut. [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 5:45 am
A court in the Northern District of California in Google LLC v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 1:01 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 11:34 am
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEYAPPELLATE DIVISIONDOCKET NO. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
PEOPLE v. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
" Id. at 998 (citation and quotation marks omitted). [read post]
14 May 2009, 6:27 am
McCain Foods, Ltd., 941 F.2d 970, 974 (9th Cir. 1991) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 6:36 am
He remained in the position until being elected a Pima County Superior Court Judge. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
Byrnes, The Supreme Court [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 8:32 am
Roemer, 501 U.S. 380 (1991), where the Court held that section 2 of the Voting Rights Act covers judicial elections. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 5:45 am
Argued October 12, 1993 -- Decided May 26, 1994On certification to the Superior Court, Law Division, Middlesex County.Simon Louis Rosenbach, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for appellant (Robert W. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 8:36 pm
Haslip, 499 U.S. 1, 18-19 (1991). [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 1:16 pm
The Superior Court rejected each of the plaintiff’s theories. [read post]
