Search for: "People v. Superior Court (Price) (1984)"
Results 1 - 20
of 31
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Inst. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 4:33 pm
An approach more aware of regular people’s concerns must therefore come from the agencies and their work in the courts. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:54 am
NAACP v. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 10:23 am
On May 19, 2022, Cornell penned an article castigating in advance the Supreme Court for being likely to uphold the right to bear arms in the case New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
12 May 2022, 6:02 am
People v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Professor of Law & Director of Clinical Legal Education, UC Davis School of Law--Robert Cover as Critical Race Theorist Mark Graber, University System of Maryland Regents Professor, University of Maryland Carey School of Law & Sandford V. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 9:45 am
Here's a very rough draft (not yet cite-checked and proofread), which you can also read in PDF; I'd love to hear people's view on it. [read post]
7 Aug 2016, 10:02 pm
Morton Bldg., Inc., 737 F.2d 698, 710–11 (7th Cir. 1984). [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 7:18 am
U.S., 468 U.S. 796(1984). [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 5:04 am
Price v. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 5:53 pm
--Whitman v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 6:01 pm
(Ontario Court of Appeal,TPG Technology Consulting Ltd. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm
Pioneer manufacturers that have long since ceased making or selling a product end up saddled with liability that can only be recouped by raising the prices of other, unrelated pioneer products. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 6:37 am
(Gillan and Quinton v United Kingdom (2009) The search powers of security personnel at airports were qualitatively different, said the Court. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 12:14 pm
Henderson of the Superior Court of Justice dated July 6, 2010, with reasons reported at (2010), 76 C.C.L.T. (3d) 92. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 10:59 am
Lee, supra, 539 F.2d 606, 610; People v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 4:25 am
Pursuant to a Court Order dated February 5, 2009, t [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 7:15 pm
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
The Cassidys and their son Daniel subsequently cross-complained against Blix Street for royalties allegedly owing.2 The trial of the case commenced in March of 2006, presided over by Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Lee Edmon. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
The Cassidys and their son Daniel subsequently cross-complained against Blix Street for royalties allegedly owing.2 The trial of the case commenced in March of 2006, presided over by Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Lee Edmon. [read post]
