Search for: "People v. Superior Court (Scott) (1980)" Results 1 - 19 of 19
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2022, 10:01 am by jonathanturley
The case raises an interesting question of “respondeat superior” for the negligent acts by employees in the course of employment. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Stanley Fish in his remarks on the “interpretation wars” of the 1980s notes that most of the key participants were Jewish, whether or not observant. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 7:17 am by Paul Smith
”  The example he gives is the cases in the 1970s and 1980s that used equal protection principles to eradicate laws that still mandated an unequal form of marriage in which the husband was superior to the wife in rights and power. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 6:45 am by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) I recently read an interesting tort case, Stephens v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am by Abbott & Kindermann
In the 1980 decree, the court sought to determine water rights to groundwater interconnected with the Scott River. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 1:52 am
These are analogous powers that the English Superior Courts had under the prerogative writs of mandamus, certiorari, prohibition, habeas corpus and quo-warranto. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 6:02 pm by Contributor
In fact, the most extensive study on SLAPPs to date, which was conducted in the late 1980s, found that plaintiffs did not succeed 77-82% of the time.[10] SLAPP lawsuits primarily wreak their mischief through the litigation process.[11] The plaintiff uses the various steps in the litigation process to waste the time and drain the financial resources of the defendant. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 7:31 am
Pam KarlanRick Hills's recent post over at Prawfsblawg on the Supreme Court's decision in Riley v. [read post]