Search for: "People v. Sutton" Results 61 - 80 of 190
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2015, 7:03 am by John Gregory
It says: “browsewrap agreements” … are generally considered to be enforceable contracts And courts in Canada typically uphold and enforce Terms of Use (or website browsewrap agreements) So far as I know, Canadian courts have upheld browsewrap contracts in two cases, one in BC cited by the firm (Century 21 v Rogers) and one in Quebec (Sutton Realty). [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 5:01 pm by Sandy Levinson
  Putting to one side that Judge Sutton and the Sixth Circuit created an embarrassing conflict in the circuits that was otherwise not present, I emphasized to my class the key fact that public opinion had moved so fast on the issue, that many more Americans today support the right to same-sex marriage than supported inter-racial marriage at the time of Loving v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 12:17 pm by Guest Blogger
In his opinion for 6th Circuit Court of Appeals, last November, upholding the constitutionality of state non-recognition of same-sex marriage and provoking the Supreme Court to take up the issue, Judge Jeffrey Sutton asserted that, “If it is constitutionally irrational to stand by the man-woman definition of marriage, it must be constitutionally irrational to stand by the monogamous definition of marriage. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 8:16 pm by Robert Dietrick
Harkening to doubts expressed by Judge Sutton in his United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 3:00 am by Scott Bomboy
The table was set for these arguments in June 2013, when the Court ruled in United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 2:42 pm by JB
Two interesting amicus briefs in Obergefell v. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 12:55 pm
On the other hand, laws limiting marriage to opposite-sex couples long predate the era when most people even realized that homosexuals are a distinct group (as opposed to being essentially heterosexual people somehow tempted into what was considered sinful or antisocial behavior). [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 8:52 am by William Eskridge
   Starting with his landmark opinion for the Court in Romer v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 2:51 pm by Pamela Wolf
“When the courts do not let the people resolve new social issues like this one, they perpetuate the idea that the heroes in these change events are judges and lawyers,” wrote Judge Jeffrey Sutton. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 12:31 pm by Austin Nimocks
Another good reason to review Judge Sutton’s opinion is how he aptly addresses both Loving v. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 3:05 am by Scott Bomboy
A delay on taking the cases would potentially affect a lot of people. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 3:00 am by NCC Staff
“Reasonable people can debate whether the ruling in this case was correct and who it binds. [read post]