Search for: "People v. Sutton" Results 101 - 120 of 190
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2009, 1:53 pm by Keith Jones
More specifically, the ADAA rejects the holdings by the United States Supreme Court in Sutton v. [read post]
29 May 2009, 1:53 pm by Keith Jones
More specifically, the ADAA rejects the holdings by the United States Supreme Court in Sutton v. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 7:07 pm
" More specifically, the Act rejects the standard announced by the Supreme Court in Sutton v. [read post]
2 May 2020, 9:50 pm by Josh Blackman
[Liquor Stores may be "life-sustaining," but houses of worship are "soul-sustaining"] Yesterday, a per curiam Sixth Circuit panel (Sutton, McKeague, and Nalbandian) decided Maryville Baptist Church v. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 5:40 am by SHG
It is well-settled law that legislative enactments carry a strong presumption of constitutionality (People v Stuart, 100 NY2d 412, 422 [2003); People v Scott, 26 NY2d 286, 291 [1970)) Thus, a party seeking to find a statute unconstitutional bears a heavy burden and “must demonstrate, ‘beyond a reasonable doubt’, that the statute suffers from ‘wholesale constitutional impairment'” (People v… [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 10:50 am by Steven G. Pearl
I appreciated Tracey's candor.Daphne Aneet moderated a panel on employee privacy with Brenda Sutton-Wills and Irma Rodriguez Moisa. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 4:08 am by SHG
In dissent, Judge Jeffrey Sutton called bullshit. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 5:01 pm by Sandy Levinson
  Putting to one side that Judge Sutton and the Sixth Circuit created an embarrassing conflict in the circuits that was otherwise not present, I emphasized to my class the key fact that public opinion had moved so fast on the issue, that many more Americans today support the right to same-sex marriage than supported inter-racial marriage at the time of Loving v. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 6:01 am by Joy Waltemath
Supreme Court’s holdings in Sutton v United Air Lines, Inc. and Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v Williams, the Iowa Supreme Court majority explained that it did not agree with the employee’s contention that the 2008 amendments required it to interpret the state law to include the disorder. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 1:16 pm by Lovechilde
Counteracting the 2010 Citizens United case and the 1976 Buckley v. [read post]