Search for: "People v. Sutton"
Results 101 - 120
of 241
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2015, 5:54 am
Beginning with Sutton v. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 7:03 am
It says: “browsewrap agreements” … are generally considered to be enforceable contracts And courts in Canada typically uphold and enforce Terms of Use (or website browsewrap agreements) So far as I know, Canadian courts have upheld browsewrap contracts in two cases, one in BC cited by the firm (Century 21 v Rogers) and one in Quebec (Sutton Realty). [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 8:00 pm
Facts In Lawson v. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 5:01 pm
Putting to one side that Judge Sutton and the Sixth Circuit created an embarrassing conflict in the circuits that was otherwise not present, I emphasized to my class the key fact that public opinion had moved so fast on the issue, that many more Americans today support the right to same-sex marriage than supported inter-racial marriage at the time of Loving v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 12:17 pm
In his opinion for 6th Circuit Court of Appeals, last November, upholding the constitutionality of state non-recognition of same-sex marriage and provoking the Supreme Court to take up the issue, Judge Jeffrey Sutton asserted that, “If it is constitutionally irrational to stand by the man-woman definition of marriage, it must be constitutionally irrational to stand by the monogamous definition of marriage. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 8:16 pm
Harkening to doubts expressed by Judge Sutton in his United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 8:51 pm
See Lawrence v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 2:42 pm
Two interesting amicus briefs in Obergefell v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 7:13 am
State v. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 12:55 pm
On the other hand, laws limiting marriage to opposite-sex couples long predate the era when most people even realized that homosexuals are a distinct group (as opposed to being essentially heterosexual people somehow tempted into what was considered sinful or antisocial behavior). [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 8:52 am
Starting with his landmark opinion for the Court in Romer v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 3:12 pm
Feeney, and Romer v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 2:51 pm
“When the courts do not let the people resolve new social issues like this one, they perpetuate the idea that the heroes in these change events are judges and lawyers,” wrote Judge Jeffrey Sutton. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 12:31 pm
Another good reason to review Judge Sutton’s opinion is how he aptly addresses both Loving v. [read post]
28 Dec 2014, 9:30 pm
Sutton) & Richard L. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 7:32 am
Baird; Moore v. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 9:23 pm
Judge Jeffrey Sutton’s opinion for the Sixth Circuit in DeBoer v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 8:13 am
Loving v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 8:37 pm
Since he concludes that Baker v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 4:50 pm
Citing the Supreme Court’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
