Search for: "People v. Sutton"
Results 121 - 140
of 244
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2020, 3:45 am
Forest Service v. [read post]
2 May 2020, 9:50 pm
[Liquor Stores may be "life-sustaining," but houses of worship are "soul-sustaining"] Yesterday, a per curiam Sixth Circuit panel (Sutton, McKeague, and Nalbandian) decided Maryville Baptist Church v. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 5:40 am
It is well-settled law that legislative enactments carry a strong presumption of constitutionality (People v Stuart, 100 NY2d 412, 422 [2003); People v Scott, 26 NY2d 286, 291 [1970)) Thus, a party seeking to find a statute unconstitutional bears a heavy burden and “must demonstrate, ‘beyond a reasonable doubt’, that the statute suffers from ‘wholesale constitutional impairment'” (People v… [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 10:50 am
I appreciated Tracey's candor.Daphne Aneet moderated a panel on employee privacy with Brenda Sutton-Wills and Irma Rodriguez Moisa. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 2:00 am
Sutton v. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 4:08 am
In dissent, Judge Jeffrey Sutton called bullshit. [read post]
29 May 2020, 11:17 pm
His opinion quoted length from the Sixth Circuit's decision in Roberts v. [read post]
19 Nov 2022, 12:40 pm
Sutton v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 2:00 pm
(Judge Sutton’s concurring opinion in Lyons v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 7:19 am
Wickard v. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 10:27 pm
Newsom, which favorably cites Judge Sutton's Neace decision: the state cannot assume that people of faith are less trustworthy. than others who receive exemptions. [read post]
23 Sep 2012, 12:00 pm
In one case, Sutton v. [read post]
23 Sep 2012, 12:00 pm
In one case, Sutton v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
[This is the second installment in a series about the oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 12:45 pm
As the Founding-era Supreme Court held in McCulloch v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 7:32 am
Baird; Moore v. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 6:06 am
Arizona v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 6:21 pm
See Ward v. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 6:01 am
Supreme Court’s holdings in Sutton v United Air Lines, Inc. and Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v Williams, the Iowa Supreme Court majority explained that it did not agree with the employee’s contention that the 2008 amendments required it to interpret the state law to include the disorder. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 11:24 am
In Krimstock v. [read post]
