Search for: "People v. Szabo"
Results 1 - 20
of 20
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2022, 9:09 am
Attorney General (a/k/a NetChoice v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 9:54 am
So, Szabo said AT MINIMUM the law applies to those three entities. [read post]
30 Dec 2021, 9:12 am
As you recall, earlier this year Florida passed SB 7072, a brazenly censorial #MAGA bill. [read post]
19 Sep 2021, 9:37 am
But what makes social media platforms different is their ability to shape public discourse not by promoting their own messages but by silencing voices they deem to be harmful…. the bottleneck position that comes with control of these platforms brings with it a remarkable power to censor” By virtue of making publication decisions, every publisher necessarily “silences” the voices of people it chooses not to publish. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 7:14 pm
In other words, people who try to cloak censorial regulations as pro-free speech are actually trampling on the Constitution. [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 8:01 am
Case library Amicus briefs in support of the preliminary injunction Internet Association RCFP et al EFF et al Chamber of Progress et al TechFreedom Preliminary injunction brief (if you get an error message downloading one of the files below, hit refresh) Schruers declaration Szabo declaration Veitch declaration Potts declaration Rumenap declaration Esparza declaration Pavlovic declaration Blog post on preliminary injunction brief Netchoice v. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 10:59 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 11:18 am
[xxiv] More than 11,000 people contributed over $150 million to the organization. [read post]
7 May 2018, 5:00 am
“Artificial Intelligence Could Soon Enhance Real-Time Police Surveillance” reads a recent Wall Street Journal headline. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 10:04 am
We’ll be working hard to clear the waitlist and get as many people into the conference as possible. * After the First Circuit’s important Doe v. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 10:04 am
We’ll be working hard to clear the waitlist and get as many people into the conference as possible. * After the First Circuit’s important Doe v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 9:00 am
More SESTA-Related Posts: * Debunking Some Myths About Section 230 and Sex Trafficking (Guest Blog Post) * Congress Is About To Ruin Its Online Free Speech Masterpiece (Cross-Post) * Backpage Executives Must Face Money Laundering Charges Despite Section 230–People v. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 4:04 am
Article 1(3) of that Directive limits the field of application of the directive to activities falling with the TFEU, thereby excluding matters covered by Titles V and VI of the TEU at that time (e.g. public security, defence, State security). [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 7:47 am
In Williams v. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 5:50 am
Via Eugene Volokh at WaPo Conspiracy, the 9th Circuit’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 3:30 pm
Whitney Ogden of Cronkite News Service reports that the case, Ryan v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 10:35 pm
For support of this approach in case law take a look at the following cases: Szabo v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 4:15 am
, 261 F.3d 679 (7th Cir.2001);Szabo v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 12:55 pm
Gravante, the attorney who represented Frank Esposito in People v. [read post]
9 Aug 2007, 4:41 am
Sprint Corp., 261 F.3d 679, 681-82 (7th Cir.2001); Szabo v. [read post]
