Search for: "People v. Taylor (1986)" Results 1 - 20 of 47
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2015, 1:48 pm by davidferriero
This year, in recognition of Taylor Branch’s groundbreaking research on the Civil Rights Movement, we presented two facsimiles of a document that he sought under a 1986 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the FBI, Branch v. [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 4:37 am
’ Yet another, S.S., told Bell Rainey commented to her that he thought she had `”messed” with some nasty people’ and suggested that he otherwise would have, in S.S.'s words, `turn[ed][her] back “straight” from being “gay. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 11:19 am
As far as groundbreaking jurisprudence goes, the first decision passed down by the Supreme Court of Canada — dated June 5, 1876 — may seem a bit underwhelming.In Taylor v. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 8:10 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Taylor, 477 U.S. 131, 136–37 (1986); Diamond v. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 11:15 am
The rule of three was held valid by the Court of Appeals in People v Gaffney, 201 NY 535, a case decided in 1911.In applying the Rule of Three, tie scores can allow the appointing authority to make its selection from among far more than three eligibles. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 6:19 am by Steven M. Gursten
Fischer decision, authored by former Chief Justice Taylor, made it far more difficult for people injured by negligent drivers to get their case before a jury. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
 A warning about an inherent risk – a so-called “risk warning” – serves an entirely different purpose.With inherent risks, people are warned so they can decide whether that risk outweighs the benefits that might be gained from using the product. [read post]