Search for: "People v. Teague"
Results 1 - 20
of 64
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2015, 8:41 am
He rejected the petitioner's argument that exhaustion was futile in light of People v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 9:46 am
Kentucky, 479 U.S. 314, in 1987 and for collateral review in Teague v. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 5:33 am
In Teague v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 7:21 pm
Today in People v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
The Court’s jurisdiction rested on an exception to the non-retroactivity of new rules.In Teague v. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 7:35 am
They include: People v. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 3:41 pm
Applying Teague v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 7:24 pm
The fundamental spirit of Teague v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 8:18 pm
The second relevant case in Danforth is Teague v. [read post]
27 Apr 2014, 3:09 pm
Teague (1989) and People v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 2:38 am
Under the Supreme Court's landmark 1989 decision in Teague v. [read post]
24 May 2013, 8:39 am
The ACLU came to our defense, winning a landmark Supreme Court decision in Tinker v Des Moines (1969). [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 4:42 pm
"[T]rial counsel's duty of effective assistance includes the responsibility to advise the defendant concerning the exercise of [the] constitutional right" to testify at trial (Brown v Artuz, 124 F3d 73, 74, cert denied 522 US 1128; see People v Carpenter, 52 AD3d 729, lv denied 11 NY3d 830; People v Perry, 266 AD2d 151, 152, lv denied 95 NY2d 856). [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 8:56 am
Despite the apparent clarity of this “rule,” the Court’s decision in Teague v. [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 9:01 pm
The ruling that Ramos will not apply retroactively on habeas is no doubt, a disappointment to people who had hoped to bring collateral challenges and try their luck at a second trial.In this column, I will consider something a bit different from whether Ramos announced a watershed new rule for purposes of Teague v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 8:59 am
In a couple of weeks, the Supreme Court will hear arguments in the case of Kahler v. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 4:00 am
A line of cases beginning with Teague v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 6:53 pm
Estas peticiones, como se menciona en la propia decisión mayoritaria, serán evaluadas según los estrictos requisitos establecidos en la opinión por pluralidad de Teague v. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 2:50 pm
And prior to Teague, in DeStefano v. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 1:34 pm
The Supreme Court’s 1989 decision in Teague v. [read post]
