Search for: "People v. Thames" Results 1 - 20 of 46
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2022, 1:00 am by Frank Cranmer
In England, the estimated number of people testing positive for COVID-19 is around 1 in 19 people (compared with the earlier figure of 1 in 30); in Wales 1 in 17 people (compared with 1 in 30); in Northern Ireland, 1 in 17 people (compared with 1 in 25); and in Scotland, 1 in 16 (compared with 1 in 18). [read post]
10 Apr 2022, 4:56 pm by INFORRM
The Mishcon de Reya blog also published an article on FoIs last week, explaining the recent decision of Moss v Kingston-on-Thames and The Information Commissioner NJ/2018/0007, in which the High Court held that failure to comply with a FoI notice is contempt of court. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
Whatever the reason, the government has done it and now people are reading the wording of Section 59. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 12:43 am by Cyberleagle
Whatever the reason, the government has done it and now people are reading the wording of Section 59. [read post]
9 Feb 2020, 7:17 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
In Raincoast Conservation Foundation v. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
Warby J held that the only safe approach to take is to assume that the readership includes lay people with no special knowledge that would affect the way they read the words complained of. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
In the recent case of Fearn v  The Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery ([2019] EWHC 246 (Ch)) the High Court analysed privacy rights from a novel perspective in both literal and legal terms. [read post]
19 Aug 2018, 11:43 pm by Tessa Shepperson
R (Gaskin) v LB Richmond Upon Thames (2018) EWHC 1996 (Admin) In this case the High Court overturned a prosecution against Mr Gaskin and gave substantial guidance on fees and other points associated with HMO licensing, and by implication selective licensing, schemes under the Housing Act 2004. [read post]
7 Jan 2018, 1:51 pm by Giles Peaker
In my view, he is correct that there is insufficient here arguably to amount to an assumption of care so as to satisfy the approach in X v Hounslow or Darby v Richmond-upon-Thames. [read post]
22 Oct 2017, 4:18 pm by Giles Peaker
It is also emphasized that the comparator must be with ordinary people, not ordinary homeless people. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 4:00 am by Administrator
Chippewas of the Thames First Nation v. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 7:34 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Petroleum Geo‑Services Inc. and Chippewas of the Thames First Nation v. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 2:15 pm by Giles Peaker
And then there was Darby (administratrix of the estate of Lee Rabbetts deceased) v Richmond Upon Thames LBC. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 2:06 pm by Giles Peaker
We have seen such agreements raised before, for instance in London Borough of Southwark v Ofogba [2012] EWHC 1620 (QB), Lambeth LBC v Thomas (1997) 30 HLR 89 and Rochdale MBC v Dixon [2011] EWCA Civ 1173. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 5:29 am by INFORRM
The use of investigatory powers is vital to locate missing people, to place a suspect at the scene of a crime or to identify who was in contact with whom. [read post]
28 May 2015, 4:11 am by INFORRM
Another legal principle relied upon by the judge founded on the famous case of Armory v. [read post]