Search for: "People v. The Commissioners" Results 21 - 40 of 2,328
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2017, 11:38 pm
Data Protection Commissioner (C.J.E.U.), with introductory note by Tobias J. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 7:00 am by JONATHAN GLASSON QC, MATRIX
In March 2017, the Supreme Court (sitting in a panel comprising Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Kerr and Lord Hughes) heard the appeal of the Metropolitan Police Service (“MPS”) in the case of Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis v DSD & Anor. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 3:00 am by Paul Caron
Commissioner, No. 10230-10, involving the IRS's treatment of losses incurred in making the documentary film Smile 'Til It Hurts: The Up With People Story as hobby losses under § 183. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 2:02 pm by privacylawyer
The Canadian Federal Court clearly concluded this in State Farm v Privacy Commissioner.* In that case, the OPC asserted its jurisdiction over an insurance company because they were clearly commercial, even when acting on behalf of an individual defendant in a car accident lawsuit. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 1:06 pm by Tom Smith
A Wisconsin judge held three state election commissioners in contempt on Monday and ordered them to proceed immediately with purging more than 200,000 people from the state’s voter rolls.The ruling by Judge Paul V. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 10:35 am
 Made even more difficult by the reality that (1) some ailments truly do not have many objective signs, and (2) some people are willing to claim ailments of this type but do not in fact have them. [read post]
1 May 2014, 4:00 am by John Gregory
The question arose in the case of Getup Ltd. v Electoral Commissioner [2010] FCA 869, whether this signature could be electronic, and if so, what kind of e-signature would be satisfactory. [read post]
23 May 2012, 6:37 am by INFORRM
  Sir Charles Gray, sitting as a Commissioner, with two Jurats (of which, more later), entered judgment for the plaintiffs on the basis that the cartoon was not defamatory (Pitman v Jersey Evening Post [2012] JRC 92). [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 2:02 pm by privacylawyer
The Canadian Federal Court clearly concluded this in State Farm v Privacy Commissioner.* In that case, the OPC asserted its jurisdiction over an insurance company because they were clearly commercial, even when acting on behalf of an individual defendant in a car accident lawsuit. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 9:26 am
“Transgender people’s rights are human rights,” said chief commissioner Barbara Hall. [read post]
3 Jun 2012, 9:05 am by Lisa Milam-Perez
Nor did the EEOC’s April ruling in Macy v Holder create a new protected class of transgender people, Feldblum said. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 5:29 am by Chris Seaton
No less an authority than the United States Supreme Court declared this a non-issue this year when they denied certiorari in Davis v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 7:30 am by Aidan Wills, Matrix
The Justices considered two previous judgments in which it/the House of Lords has held suspicionless stop and search powers to comply with article 8 (R (Gillan) v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis [2006] UKHL 12; Beghal v Director of Public Prosecutions [2015] UKSC 49) and the European Court of Human Rights’ (ECtHR) decision in Gillan v UK (2010) application no. 4158/05, in which it held that the suspicionless search power under section 44 of the… [read post]