Search for: "People v. Thomas (1987)" Results 121 - 140 of 195
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2012, 8:24 am by Lovechilde
  All three of these Reagan justices were in the majority in Bush v. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 9:06 am by Schachtman
Many people understand the state’s nickname to mean that Missourians are not gullible.3 The reality of the origins of the Missouri nickname may well be different. [read post]
1 Apr 2007, 5:19 am
It would be a user right.Originality v. novelty - copyright and patent. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
"] From Justice Christine Donohue's majority opinion (joined by Chief Justice Max Baer and Justices Thomas Saylor and David Wecht) in In the Interest of Y.W. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm by Ronald Collins
He served as dean of the law school from 1987-1994 and provost of the University of Chicago from 1994-2002. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
  Once general principles of institutional structures are understood, it is possible to contextualize these insights within the realities of the American Republic--the general government, the administrative branches, inferior political units, and the residuary role of the people as ultimate sovereigns. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 6:14 am by Heidi Henson
The updated version released at the meeting builds on longstanding guidance issued by the EEOC over 20 years ago — three separate policy documents were issued in February and July 1987 under Chair Clarence Thomas, and in September 1990 under Chair Evan Kemp. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 12:33 pm by Josh Blackman
Justices Marshall and Thomas had mustaches. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 12:18 pm by Joseph Grodin
Thirteen years ago this tension came before the Court in Republican Party of Minnesota v. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 12:43 pm by Ronald Collins
Harlan’s moral vision is memorialized in his lone dissent in Plessy v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:15 am by Steve Lombardi
Very few people would disagree that a valid reason for awarding punitive damages is to compensate the injured person for the indignity of the perpetrator’s act and that is reason enough to allow the claim to proceed against the estate. [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 9:05 am by Jack Sharman
Two that come to mind, for example, are Evan Thomas’s The Man To See (1992) (about Edward Bennett Williams) and Louis Nizer’s  My Life In Court (1961). [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 9:53 pm
Christine Bruhn at the University of California, Davis published many of the pioneering studies on consumer acceptance, and recently made this comment about consumer acceptance of food irradiation in a series on the new FDA rule published by Jim Prevor’s Perishable Pundit (2008): “My work and that of other researchers over the last 20 years has found some people are ready to buy irradiated product right now….This group of consumers represents maybe 10 percent… [read post]