Search for: "People v. Thompson" Results 41 - 60 of 821
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2011, 9:14 am by Steven M. Gursten
It’s about government closest to the people and equal justice with no special rules for anybody. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 7:45 pm
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments today (transcript here) in Thompson v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 6:50 pm by Danielle Wild
Candidate at Syracuse University College of Law and Intern at Easton Thompson Kasperek Shiffrin LLPYesterday, the New York Court of Appeals decided People v. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 6:55 pm by Gregory Forman
  They dated other people and Powell lived with two different women around 2015-16. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 5:22 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Rev. 307Tribal Jurisdiction Under The Second Montana Exception: Implications Of United States v. [read post]
Here, Professor Buzz Thompson, a global expert on water and natural resources who has served as Special Master for the United States Supreme Court in Montana v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 3:10 pm by Richard Ford
 As compared to earlier affirmative action cases, relatively little is really at stake in Fisher v. [read post]
29 Dec 2013, 3:13 pm
As was recognized in Thompson v Utah, labels are not particularly helpful in this area of constitutional analysis, since changes affecting the penalty for or the substance of a crime may easily be disguised as procedural enactments. [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 7:35 am
First, on June 5, 2009 in People v Joseph (63 AD3d 1658 [June 5, 2009]), then on June 12, 2009, in People v Mills (63 AD3d 1717 [June 12, 2009]) and, again on July 10, 2009 in People v Reome (2009 NY Slip Op 05804 [July 10, 2009]).Since 1995 there have been more than 1500 such decisions statewide. [read post]