Search for: "People v. Tillman" Results 1 - 20 of 116
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
[Josh Blackman] Tablet Magazine on Tillman: "A thinker whose mind hasn't been corrupted by politics."
22 Mar 2024, 9:33 am by Josh Blackman
And that assumption is necessary to defend INS v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Josh Blackman] Part II – A Response to Professor Jed Shugerman on Slate in 2017, and his most recent 2024 Tweet Thread(s), About The 1793 Hamilton Document!
3 Mar 2024, 12:24 pm by Josh Blackman
  Tillman has studied the lists prepared by Secretary Hamilton and his staff. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Josh Blackman] A Response to Professor John Mikhail on "Officers of the United States"—Part II
22 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm by Josh Blackman
”] [This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman.] [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Josh Blackman] A Response to John Mikhail on "Officers of the United States"—Part I
20 Feb 2024, 2:16 pm by Josh Blackman
For example, in Smith v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
A Reality Check on "Officers of the United States" at the Founding
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am by John Mikhail
Trump prioritized this argument in his briefs to the Court, drawing primarily on the scholarship of Seth Barrett Tillman and his co-author, Josh Blackman. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
[Josh Blackman] Oral Arguments in Trump v. Anderson Part III: Justice Kavanaugh Gets Griffin's Case  and Justice Barrett gets FedCourts
9 Feb 2024, 1:28 pm by Josh Blackman
The relevant precedent would be Arizona v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Josh Blackman] Oral Arguments in Trump v. Anderson Part II: Justice Jackson Gets "Office under the United States"
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am by Josh Blackman
[This is the second installment in a series about the oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Josh Blackman] Oral Arguments in Trump v. Anderson Part I: Justice Gorsuch Gets "Officers of the United States"
9 Feb 2024, 9:20 am by Josh Blackman
During oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
A packed courtroom for the Trump ballot case
8 Feb 2024, 2:41 pm by Mark Walsh
Term Limits v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
[Eugene Volokh] "Seven Questions on Section 3: A Response to Professor Kurt Lash"
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am by Eugene Volokh
Lash's response to the Amar brothers' amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Josh Blackman] Tillman in the Times: "A Legal Outsider, an Offbeat Theory and the Fate of the 2024 Election"
7 Feb 2024, 7:42 am by Josh Blackman
"] Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Six: The Two “Off-Ramp” Arguments Based Upon In re Griffin’s Case that Would Allow the Supreme Court to Avoid Deciding Whether Trump is Eligible to be President
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
As I explained in one of my earlier posts, several or all of the Justices might be inclined to decide the case on some ground that doesn’t require the Court to decide whether Donald Trump is eligible to be President, if such an “off-ramp” solution is legally available. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
[Josh Blackman] In Trump v. Anderson, the Respondents' Theory Would Render Unconstitutional Every Speaker and President Pro Tempore Since 1789, as Well as President Grant's VP and Presidential Candidate George McGovern
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm by Josh Blackman
Fund v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Four: Trump’s Argument That His Tenure as President Did Not Subject Him to Section 3 Because the President is Not an “Officer of the United States”
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
 This claim is, of course, deeply counterintuitive, and it would be very awkward, to say the least, for the Supreme Court to explain to the American people that Section 3 doesn’t apply to someone who’s been President because although that person held an “office,” it wasn’t an office “of the United States. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
[Josh Blackman] Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar Retreat From Their "Global" Rule for the "Offices" and "Officers" of the Constitution
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm by Josh Blackman
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Josh Blackman] We're In The Section 3 Endgame Now
10 Jan 2024, 11:14 pm by Josh Blackman
[This post is co-authored with Seth Barrett Tillman] On Friday, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Trump v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Josh Blackman] Louisville Daily Journal (April 1868): The President is not an "Officer of the United States"
9 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by Josh Blackman
Here the article invoked the same reasoning used by Chief Justice Marshall in United States v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Josh Blackman] Amicus Brief Filed in Trump v. Griswold On Behalf of Professor Seth Barrett Tillman
9 Jan 2024, 11:59 am by Josh Blackman
" Biden v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Josh Blackman] A New, Rushed, Flawed Article In The Section 3 Debate
4 Jan 2024, 12:50 pm by Josh Blackman
We cite the corpus linguistics amicus brief written by James Heilpern in Lucia v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Clearinghouse: 14th Amendment Section 3 Litigation
3 Jan 2024, 7:09 am by Norman L. Eisen
Supreme Court, Colorado Republican State Central Committee v. [read post]
Just Security - https://www.justsecurity.org/