Search for: "People v. Trapps"
Results 1 - 12
of 12
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2014, 1:36 pm
The Supreme Court has granted certiorari to address the issue in Wurie and a similar case, People v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 12:12 pm
“[Officer Trapp]: It's fine? [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 5:38 pm
And since Spangler said AWA is unconstitutional, that would be that.Except for this.The same day Judges Grendell,Cannon, and Trapp decided Spangler, a different (though overlapping) panel of three judges from the Eleventh District (Trapp, Rice, and O'Toole) decided State v. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 5:05 am
In People v Trapp, Court of Appeals No. 282662, the Court of Appeals answered the question about what a court is supposed to do when the Defendant claims that he does not have the means to pay this fee. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 4:49 am
People, 2012 V.I. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 3:05 am
Supreme Court dismisses appeal in Servier v Apotex. [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 3:24 am
On the jiplp weblog there's an analysis of the Court of Justice of the European Union's latest "clarification" of European law on the registration of product shapes as trade marks in Hauck v Stokke, the "Tripp Trapp" chair case. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 9:51 am
DS hugging people who spoke, shaking hands, talking. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:29 am
Trapp, 294 S.E.2d 446, 454-56 (W. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 11:37 am
The decision in Anderson v. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 7:01 am
., “Azov” and “Aidar”, respectively) and “attempts to overthrow the government” of the “Donetsk People’s Republic” (“DPR”), i.e., Russia’s proxies in Ukrainian territory largely occupied by Russia. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
This is what Roland has to say:In June, CJEU Advocate General Wathelet issued his opinion in Nestlé v Cadbury (Case C-215/14 [noted by the IPKat here].The perceived wisdom has since been that Nestlé's Kit Kat shape (left) must necessarily be unregistrable as a trade mark. [read post]
