Search for: "People v. Trevino" Results 1 - 20 of 26
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2016, 12:05 pm
Today's holding by the Court of Appeal holds that a "house car" by any other name still qualifies as a castle. [read post]
31 May 2013, 7:50 am by Conor McEvily
Perkins and Trevino v. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 8:14 am by Steve Vladeck
Davila responded that, under Martinez (and the court’s 2013 ruling in Trevino v. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 11:04 am by Kent Scheidegger
  Originally, Martinez was supposed to be only for states that had a rule saying all trial IAC claims must be brought in habeas corpus and not on direct appeal, but in Trevino v. [read post]
29 May 2013, 11:36 am by John Elwood
Houston, 12-8906, involving a pro se habeas petitioner from Nebraska who may have won himself a shiny new GVR in light of yesterday’s opinion in Trevino v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 9:03 am by The Charge
  Building on Martinez in this term, the Court decided Trevino v. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 6:04 pm by John Elwood
Sepulvado asked that his case be held for Trevino v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 6:52 am by Bexis
Deposition2007-11-14 In re Prempro PLL (hormone therapy) Deposition2007-11-14 Hernandez-Trevino v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:47 am by John Elwood
Just identifying all those relists on the court’s docket, and then figuring out the legal issues involved, was a big job for people who really do have other responsibilities. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 7:19 am by John Elwood
Colson, 12-390, a capital habeas case from the Sixth Circuit that is almost certainly being held for Trevino v. [read post]
25 May 2018, 6:41 am by John Elwood
Ohio, 17-7233, both were convicted of killing people in botched robberies. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 9:01 am by Tejinder Singh
Dansby then sought certiorari, arguing that his claims relating to ineffective assistance of counsel were not procedurally defaulted; the case was vacated and remanded for reconsideration in light of Trevino v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am by John Elwood
But it seems to me that people are overlooking the obvious answer: While many people were hoping and praying during the bleak dull days of October Term 2016 that the Supreme Court would finally get some interesting cases, nobody thought to wish that the court would ever actually decide them. [read post]