Search for: "People v. Turner (1985)" Results 1 - 20 of 33
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2014, 6:06 am by INFORRM
As is well known, at the common law, following Thornton v Telegraph Media Group [2011] 1 WLR 1985, “defamatory” incorporates a qualification or threshold of seriousness: “the publication of which [a claimant] complains may be defamatory of him because it [substantially] affects in an adverse manner the attitude of other people towards him, or has a tendency to do so. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 7:50 am by Eugene Volokh
Louisiana, 379 U.S. 64, 67 (1964) (taking the same view as Herbert); In re Gronowicz, 764 F.2d 983, 988 & n.4 (3d Cir. 1985) (en banc) (likewise); Phelps v. [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Viking Press, 378 N.W.2d 875 (S.D. 1985). [270] Phone companies are common carriers. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 2:58 pm by Guest Author
 The Court has upheld laws like that in many instances, including Turner (requiring that cable systems carry broadcast television channels), Rumsfeld v. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 7:30 am by Mathew Purchase, Matrix
He applied his Guidance on the Identification of the Ordinary Residence of People in Need of Community Care Services, England, which purported to apply the House of Lords judgment in R v Barnet LBC, ex parte Shah [1983] 2 AC 309 and Turner J’s judgment in R v Waltham Forest, ex parte Vale The Times, 25 February 1985. [read post]