Search for: "People v. Turner (1990)" Results 21 - 40 of 51
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2016, 12:06 pm by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
Indeed, that is why all witnesses—lay or expert—are called: to get what they know about the case that other people do not. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 2:07 pm
” The “direct and material” requirement comes from Supreme Court precedent such as Turner Broadcasting v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 5:57 am
Smith (1990), which says, “The government may not compel affirmation of religious belief, see Torcaso v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 11:11 am by Marvin Ammori
Because I spent the next week talking to people about the post, I reviewed her scholarship again and had some more thoughts. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 11:35 am
It wasn’t until 1987 that Clifford Turner and Coward Chance merged, for example, and in 2004, when Slaughter and May celebrated its 125th anniversary, most of the people who had ever been partners were still alive. [read post]
23 May 2012, 7:17 am by Andy Dorchak
Nina Turner told the Plain Dealer: “Even if the education proposal is passed in June, the time lost to organize the levy campaign will be problematic. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm by Schachtman
The more political and personal preferences are involved, and the greater the complexity of the underlying scientific analysis, the more we should expect people, historians, judges, and juries, to ignore the Royal Society’s Nullius in verba,” and to rely upon the largely irrelevant factors of reputation. [read post]