Search for: "People v. Valencia"
Results 21 - 40
of 56
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2018, 6:57 am
However, the landmark case of People v. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 6:41 am
Valencia; The People v. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 1:04 pm
(People v. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 5:03 pm
The traceback investigation determined that Sea Port Products Corp. imported the scallops that were later supplied to certain Genki Sushi locations in Hawaii, where ill people reported eating. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 12:35 pm
In Porter v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 7:27 am
Olivas 75 Gloria ValenciaWeber A. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 8:09 pm
V., Margolis, H. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 8:42 am
In 2014, the people of the Santa Clara Pueblo changed the tribal law in question in Martinez to be more reflective of tribal norms. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
Deptuck v Valencia, 2015 ONSC 6028 [7] In the interim, the Defendant seems to have dropped off the face of the earth. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 10:06 am
People v. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 8:07 pm
MG, one of the first people on the scene of the collision after it occurred, called the 911 emergency number at 2:01 A.M. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 12:36 am
It comes as no surprise, than, that Valencia Football Club and DC Comics are litigating over a bat-trade mark application, as Sophie Arrowsmith (an IP solicitor with Hamlins), hosted by Jeremy, kindly reports in this post. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 5:54 am
Supreme Court stripped tribal governments of their criminal authority over non-Indians in Oliphant v. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 5:00 am
Valencia Holding Co., no. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 4:30 am
O’Connor, Francis V., ed. [read post]
29 May 2013, 4:29 am
Abstract: I approach this discussion by noting that Santa Clara Pueblo v. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 10:30 am
Chistopher Columbus at the Royal Court of Spain, by Václav Brožik c.1884 This Easter Sunday, March 31, marks the 521st anniversary of the issuance of the Alhambra Decree. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 4:02 am
Finally, please report any broken or inoperative links, as well as any errors and omissions, to the TTABlogger at jwelch at lalaw.com.Trinity Church, Copley Square, BostonSection 2(a) - Deceptiveness:Precedential No. 9: TTAB Affirms 2(a) Deceptiveness Refusal of WHITE JASMINE for TeaTTAB Affirms Deceptiveness Refusal of "VALENCIA" for RiceSection 2(a) - Disparagement:Your Thoughts Regarding H.R. 1278 - the "Non-Disparagement of Native American Persons or Peoples in Trademark… [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 5:30 am
A new trial for damages should also reopen the question of liability RANCHO LA VALENCIA, INC. [read post]
