Search for: "People v. Valentine"
Results 81 - 100
of 122
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
Rev. 964, 994 (1978). [4] See, e.g., Seana Valentine Shiffrin, A Thinker-Based Approach to Freedom of Speech, 27 Const. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
Valentine’s Day. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 1:13 pm
Valentin v. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 12:16 pm
In Valentine v. [read post]
19 May 2020, 11:45 am
In Valentine v. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 4:37 am
In People v. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 6:30 am
Valentine v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Valentine, No. 06-5648 In a criminal proceeding in which defendant plead guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm, denial of defendant's motion to suppress evidence seized in his apartment after his arrest and from the sentence imposed after defendant pleaded guilty, is vacated and remanded where defendant's arrest was not supported by probable cause. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 10:07 am
The Valentine’s Day Order, issued by Judge Joshua H. [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 7:00 am
The novel is structured around the mythical and endless case, Jarndyce v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
Valentine v. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 10:56 am
” See, e.g., Porter v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:50 am
IPSO 11161-22 Park’s of Hamilton Limited v The Scottish Sun, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: publication of adjudication 11822-21 Law v express.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 02114-22 Bird v thesun.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: publication of correction 11120-22 Cozens-Hardy v The Daily Telegraph, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: publication of correction 11319-22 Maclennan… [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 9:34 am
The AmeriKat in full sheep get-up ready to bleat on about the Scrutiny Committee Over a glass of wine after the AIPPI Seminar on HGS v Eli Lily this past November (see post on case here), the AmeriKat could be heard bleating about the importance of the UK’s Parliament European Scrutiny Committee’s interest in the proposed unitary patent system to anyone who would listen to her – which was about 3 people. [read post]
29 Jan 2008, 4:00 pm
" Farrell v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 2:35 am
Essentially, the problem here was that Marks & Spencer bought the word 'interflora' as a keyword for Google's AdWord paid referencing service, so that people who were looking for the world-famous Interflora flower delivery service would find an advertisement for Marks & Spencer's rival service at the top of the non-organic, paid-for search results. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 4:59 am
Springtime is the time for flowers, which makes it totally appropriate that the first little buds should begin to appear in Case C-323/09 Interflora Inc and Interflora British Unit v Marks & Spencer plc and Flowers Direct Online Limited, a reference to the Court of the European Union (ECJ) for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice of England and Wales. [read post]
20 Aug 2023, 12:08 am
One commentator observed, “why did many apparently intelligent people get into a tizzy on the basis of the headline rather than what the Bishop actually said? [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 10:55 pm
We are grateful to the many people who helped Lea and her family during these many years. [read post]
