Search for: "People v. Valentine" Results 101 - 120 of 141
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Valentine, No. 06-5648 In a criminal proceeding in which defendant plead guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm, denial of defendant's motion to suppress evidence seized in his apartment after his arrest and from the sentence imposed after defendant pleaded guilty, is vacated and remanded where defendant's arrest was not supported by probable cause. [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 7:00 am by Kelly Goles
The novel is structured around the mythical and endless case, Jarndyce v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:50 am by INFORRM
 IPSO 11161-22 Park’s of Hamilton Limited v The Scottish Sun, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: publication of adjudication 11822-21 Law v express.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 02114-22 Bird v thesun.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: publication of correction 11120-22 Cozens-Hardy v The Daily Telegraph, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: publication of correction 11319-22 Maclennan… [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 2:35 am
Essentially, the problem here was that Marks & Spencer bought the word 'interflora' as a keyword for Google's AdWord paid referencing service, so that people who were looking for the world-famous Interflora flower delivery service would find an advertisement for Marks & Spencer's rival service at the top of the non-organic, paid-for search results. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 9:34 am
The AmeriKat in full sheep get-up ready to bleat on about the Scrutiny Committee Over a glass of wine after the AIPPI Seminar on HGS v Eli Lily  this past November (see post on case here), the AmeriKat could be heard bleating about the importance of the UK’s Parliament European Scrutiny Committee’s interest in the proposed unitary patent system to anyone who would listen to her – which was about 3 people. [read post]
20 Aug 2023, 12:08 am by Frank Cranmer
One commentator observed, “why did many apparently intelligent people get into a tizzy on the basis of the headline rather than what the Bishop actually said? [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 4:59 am
Springtime is the time for flowers, which makes it totally appropriate that the first little buds should begin to appear in Case C-323/09 Interflora Inc and Interflora British Unit v Marks & Spencer plc and Flowers Direct Online Limited, a reference to the Court of the European Union (ECJ) for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice of England and Wales. [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 4:30 am by Barry Sookman
Apotex case Monday, case summary and webcast to listen http://t.co/f1KeAesP3r -> NZ global mode ISPs to be sued for copyright infringement http://t.co/zcaAS2IQMu -> Pirate Bay Co-Founder Unable To Experience The Joys Of NES Behind Bars http://t.co/SBGsRgVgFl -> Record Labels Accuse YouTube Of Causing Them To Lose Money http://t.co/mqHp07gxzz -> HBO Criticizes Periscope Over 'Game of Thrones' Live Streams, Issues Take-Down Notices http://t.co/CMoO1BtgMi -> Proposed new… [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm by Lucie Olejnikova
Team Members: Michael Chiaramonte (2L), Vittoria Fiorenza (2L), Hanna Shoshany (3L), Victoria Wagnerman (2L) The competition involved a criminal case of People v. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
It is telling that no defendant in any of the recent high profile SLAPP cases sought to strike out the claims under the existing Wallis v Valentine [2002] EWCA Civ 1034 jurisdiction. [read post]