Search for: "People v. Valentine" Results 101 - 118 of 118
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2010, 11:02 am by lennyesq
APPELLATE TERM–SECOND DEPARTMENT Criminal Procedure Exclusion of Evidence Over Police Officer’s Repeated Failures to Appear in Court Upheld People v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 12:28 am
Valentin NEW YORK COUNTYContractsSeller Entitled to Return of Advance Paid to Broker As Closing of Condo Not Consummated by Buyer 101 Warren Street Associates LLV v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 7:26 am by Lisa Stam
In the 2009 Ontario case Cavaliere v Corvex Manufacturing, the plaintiff sued the company for wrongful dismissal. [read post]
27 Dec 2008, 10:19 am
According to Diogenes Laërtius, this was to convince the people of his time that he had been taken up by the gods on Olympus. * 272 BC: Pyrrhus of Epirus, the famous conquerer and source of the term pyrrhic victory, according to Plutarch died while fighting an urban battle in Argos on the back of an elephant when an old woman threw a roof tile at him, stunning him and allowing an Argive soldier to kill him. * 270 BC: Philitas of Cos, Greek intellectual, is said by… [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 2:06 pm
The case is People v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Valentine, No. 06-5648 In a criminal proceeding in which defendant plead guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm, denial of defendant's motion to suppress evidence seized in his apartment after his arrest and from the sentence imposed after defendant pleaded guilty, is vacated and remanded where defendant's arrest was not supported by probable cause. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 12:32 am
.-- I was reading this story by John O'Brien of Legal Newsline about the battle in the McIntosh v. [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 4:00 pm
However, think it's worth thinking about the interplay of love and law on this Valentine's Day. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy penned the superb Lawrence v. [read post]
16 Feb 2007, 7:48 am
As a Valentine's Day gift to the people of Alabama, the US Court of Appeals, 11th Circuit, has once again reaffirmed the constitutionality of Alabama's law forbidding the sale or commercial distribution of any device "primarily for the stimulation of human genital organs," i.e., sex toys. [read post]