Search for: "People v. Walker"
Results 81 - 100
of 1,016
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2013, 8:23 pm
Not until counsel has been “repeatedly unconscious through not insubstantial portions” of even capital murder trials will prejudice to the defendant will be presumed (see, Muniz v Smith, 647 F3d 619 [6th Cir 2011]; Burdine v Johnson, 262 F3d 336, 340-41 [5th Cir 2001]; Tippins v Walker, 77 F3d 682, 685 [2nd Cir 1996]). [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 2:59 am
First up is Walker v. [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 1:06 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 5:20 pm
The case of Perry v. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 7:18 am
The case is Zhang Jungrong v. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 7:48 am
” “Abt v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 10:38 am
Kischassey, bicycles without motors are not considered vehicles, and in People v. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 11:43 am
Montgomery, McCracken, Walker & Rhoads, LLP. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 12:33 pm
As to this latter question, the Court’s answer was “yes”, Lord Walker dissenting. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 4:23 am
The first oral argument was in Walker v. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 6:17 pm
Copenhagen DK, Corvallis and Santa Monica USA – 22 May 2009 by Gregg Walker, Tina Monberg, and Kenneth Cloke of Mediators Beyond Borders, 
Jens Emborg, Mie Marcussen, Lone Clausen, and Vibeke Vindeløv of Nordic Mediators Place: Glyptoteket, Copenhagen Date: The 10th and 11th December 2009 During eleven days in December 2009 delegates from throughout the world will meet in Copenhagen for the 15th Conference of the… [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 9:30 pm
Walker, 1935–1946, published in Enterprise and Society:This article examines a patenting conflict between the Halliburton Oil Well and Cementing Company and an independent inventor named Cranford Walker. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 12:19 pm
I just want to shine a little credit on Scott Walker. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 3:54 am
Comment This case is significant for two reasons: First, it tasks the Supreme Court with answering the question raised obiter by Lady Hale in Savage v South Essex NHS Trust [2009] 1 AC 653, namely “what is the extent of the state’s duty to protect all people against an immediate risk of self-harm? [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 a few weeks ago, in Walker v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 2:26 pm
Lujan v. [read post]
24 Aug 2018, 3:32 am
For Walker, this was too long. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 3:32 am
Chief Judge Vaughn Walker's decision in Perry v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:33 am
A common sense interpretation would mean people whose data has actually been misused. [read post]
16 May 2016, 7:06 pm
v=XSKGbSTvUEA Continue reading → [read post]