Search for: "People v. Wallace" Results 1 - 20 of 341
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2008, 6:00 pm
Both murders involved the fairly horrific beatings of the victims.And the convictions and death sentences of both defendants -- Keone Wallace and John Mungia -- are unanimously affirmed by the California Supreme Court.I think you get a sense of the Court's reaction to both cases from the following line of the opinion by Justice Kennard -- who's hardly a pro-death penalty fanatic -- in Wallace: "In the course of a residential burglary, defendant beat to death a… [read post]
13 May 2007, 11:18 pm
Yesterday, on "Fox News Sunday," Chris Wallace invited Rudy Giuliani to clarify what he'd said at the Republican debate on the subject of abortion, that it would be "okay" if Roe v. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 4:59 am by Susan Brenner
Constitution guarantees [t]he right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 2:02 pm
 The Second Circuit agrees with him, and says that people like this are entitled to a shot to obtain bond. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 12:58 pm
Heck led people to not file claims while they awaited the outcome of the Fourth Amendment claim, then Wallace holds it accrued in the beginning. [read post]
8 Feb 2009, 2:56 pm
In People v Wallace (2009 NY Slip Op 00915 [4th Dept 2/6/09]) the Court concluded that the defendant's playing a cassette recording of a song was admissible as evidence of defendant's consciousness of guilt. [read post]
9 May 2007, 10:34 am
Here's how Judge Wallace begins his opinion in this case: "This case presents a new issue for our court: whether debtors' pre-bankruptcy application of their right to tax refunds to post-bankruptcy tax obligations constitutes an asset that must be turned over to the bankruptcy trustee pursuant to the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 4:03 pm by Benton Martin, E.D. Mich.
He observed that the court didn't need to address the issue because Wallace did not challenge this interpretation of the statute, which is supported by United States v. [read post]