Search for: "People v. Warner (1988)" Results 1 - 19 of 19
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Aug 2007, 5:08 am
Warner, 843 F.2d 401, 403 (9th Cir. 1988) (affirming the district court's finding that a landlord lacked actual authority to consent to a search of a tenant's property because "at best, the landlord had permission to enter the property for the limited purpose of making specified repairs and occasionally mowing the lawn"); United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:29 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
Metro-Goldwyn Mayer, Inc.2 Bartsch involved an agreement entered into in 1930, in which plaintiff’s predecessor in interest granted Warner Bros. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:29 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
Metro-Goldwyn Mayer, Inc.2 Bartsch involved an agreement entered into in 1930, in which plaintiff’s predecessor in interest granted Warner Bros. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:29 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
Metro-Goldwyn Mayer, Inc.2 Bartsch involved an agreement entered into in 1930, in which plaintiff’s predecessor in interest granted Warner Bros. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 4:30 am
They save people's lives every day - that's their job - and not incidentally they prescribe our clients' products while doing that. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am by Ben
The USA was our next stopover with news that the smallest of the three major record labels, Warner Music Group (WMG) has submitted a proposed settlement to its ongoing digital royalty dispute class action with artistes. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 5:00 am by IP Dragon
She illustrated this with the Octopus Card Limited v ODD.HK Limited case.The conflict was about the validity of two short-term patents registered in the name of ODD.HK Limited. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 5:11 am by Rick Hasen
   I have also enjoyed working with Bob and Tracy on some projects, including some pro bono amicus briefs in the Supreme Court (including in McConnell v. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am by Ben
The BPI, which represents the three major recorded music labels, Universal, Sony and Warner as well as many independent labels, sent its first takedown request to Google in July 2011. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
  One of the more incredible allegations about Prenda Law, the copyright-trolling operation that sued people for downloading movies online, was that the lawyers behind Prenda and its associated companies might have created and uploaded some of the porn, simply as a way of catching more offenders. [read post]