Search for: "People v. Washington" Results 41 - 60 of 7,050
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2024, 5:02 am by Beatrice Yahia
Sahil Kapur and Frank Thorp V report for NBC News. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
In 1948, the Supreme Court outlawed these practices in the seminal case, Shelly v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 3:52 am by INFORRM
Mr Schofield was awarded £90,000 for an article published by the defendant’s which contained various defamatory and false allegations, including that Mr Schofield was involved in grooming children and/or young people. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 9:31 pm by Justin Hendrix
Sorting Fact From Fiction Murthy v Missouri started out as Missouri v Biden, a complaint filed with the US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana against President Joe Biden, several federal agencies, and government officials. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 7:12 pm by David Greene
In a case being heard Monday at the Supreme Court, 45 Washington lawmakers have argued that government communications with social media sites about possible election interference misinformation are illegal.Agencies can't even pass on information about websites state election officials have identified as disinformation, even if they don't request that any action be taken, they assert.Yet just this week the vast majority of those same lawmakers said the government's interest in… [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 12:10 am by Josh Richman
Ron Wyden and former Congressman Chris Cox in Gonzalez v. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 7:42 am by Dave Maass
They go by various names—Freedom of Information, Right-to-Know, Open Records, or even Sunshine laws—but all share the general concept that because the government is of the people, its documents belong to the people. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
Readers are requested to notify the Reporter ofDecisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Washington, D. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 1:19 am by INFORRM
The ICO has issued a reprimand to West Midlands Police after the force repeatedly mixed up two people’s personal information. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 12:24 pm by Josh Blackman
[Professor Shugerman's argument that the 1793 Hamilton Document, that is, a list of "every person holding any civil office or employment under the United States, (except the judges)," was intended to ensure compliance with the Constitution's Sinecure Clause lacks support.] [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 12:44 pm by NARF
The People of the Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa and Chippewa Indians (Ineffective Assistance of Counsel; Sentencing) The People of the Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa and Chippewa Indians v. [read post]