Search for: "People v. Washington" Results 101 - 120 of 6,333
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2025, 3:30 am by Sasha Volokh
NLRB that a newspaper couldn't fire a reporter for his pro-union activity, but the Washington Supreme Court held in Nelson v. [read post]
4 Mar 2025, 8:16 am by Above the Law
 First, from the Washington Post: “Several top prosecutors in the U.S. attorney’s office in Washington, D.C., were demoted on Friday to low-level positions handling minor crimes, another step in a campaign of retribution against Justice Department officials perceived as enemies by the Trump administration. [read post]
4 Mar 2025, 6:55 am by Ryan Goodman
“I don’t believe there were ever any career people fired at transition since the national security division was founded,” McCord said. [read post]
3 Mar 2025, 1:41 am by INFORRM
Newspaper Journalism and regulation Washington Post owner Jeff Bezos announced a shift in the newspaper’s opinion section, signalling a move toward more conservative viewpoints. [read post]
28 Feb 2025, 10:33 am by Jennifer Davis
Her commitment to equal education predated Brown v. [read post]
27 Feb 2025, 7:55 pm by John Elwood
The Institute for Justice is an public-interest firm based in the Washington, D.C., suburbs that, among other projects, seeks to challenge occupational licensing laws that it believes needlessly deprive people of economic liberty to engage in productive endeavors. [read post]
24 Feb 2025, 1:58 am by INFORRM
The report finds that the omission of ageism from the Editors’ Code “…[leaves] older people unprotected and [contributes] to a widely held perception that ageism is taken less seriously than other forms of discrimination. [read post]
23 Feb 2025, 5:57 am by Andrew Weissmann
It may well determine whether the new Trump administration will be permitted to bend people to do its bidding by resort to the most coercive of bludgeons, a criminal indictment. [read post]
17 Feb 2025, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  That is, he turns away from my own obsession with constitutional reform, which to most people I know seems too radical or else simply impossible. [read post]