Search for: "People v. Watson"
Results 81 - 100
of 365
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2023, 11:23 am
(See Edwards v. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 3:02 am
.
People v. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 2:00 am
Watson v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 9:21 am
However, the landmark case of People v. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 4:16 am
Watson, 261 N.C. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 2:14 pm
In lieu of granting leave to appeal in People v. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 4:30 am
In United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 1:53 pm
Watson in a Train Cabin (public domain) So holds Judge Posner’s opinion for the Seventh Circuit in Klinger v. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 9:30 pm
We've previously noted Zachary Newkirk’s "Full Justice May Be Done Them": The Case of Bill, Charles, Jupiter, Randolph, et al. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 5:00 am
Watson v. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 pm
While the Privacy and Electronic Communications Directive regulated the behaviour of communications providers generally, Article 1(3) of that Directive specifies that matters covered by Titles V and VI of the TEU at that time (e.g. public security, defence, State security) fall outside the scope of the directive, which the Court described as relating to “activities of the State” . [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 7:08 pm
(People v. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 9:59 pm
[People v. [read post]
12 May 2016, 10:11 am
Parks, LLC v. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 6:57 pm
Prior to the landmark case of People v. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 1:16 pm
Yafai v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 5:05 am
" Further, said the court, "[I]t is the responsibility of the administrative agency to weigh the evidence and choose from among competing inferences therefrom and, so long as the inference drawn and the ultimate determination made are supported by substantial evidence, it is not for the court to substitute its judgment for that of the administrative agency," citing Matter of Watson v New York State Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special… [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 5:05 am
" Further, said the court, "[I]t is the responsibility of the administrative agency to weigh the evidence and choose from among competing inferences therefrom and, so long as the inference drawn and the ultimate determination made are supported by substantial evidence, it is not for the court to substitute its judgment for that of the administrative agency," citing Matter of Watson v New York State Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special… [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 7:02 am
According to People v. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 8:48 am
” Sommer Foster and Shanay Watson-Whittaker Michigan Voices “We had an inkling that Roe v. [read post]
